Smoothed Analysis on Connected Graphs

The main paradigm of smoothed analysis on graphs suggests that for any large graph G in a certain class of graphs, perturbing slightly the edges of G at random (usually adding few random edges to G) typically results in a graph having much "nicer" properties. In this work we study smoothed analysis on trees or, equivalently, on connected graphs. Given an n-vertex connected graph G, form a random supergraph of G* of G by turning every pair of vertices of G into an edge with probability epsilon/n, where epsilon is a small positive constant. This perturbation model has been studied previously in several contexts, including smoothed analysis, small world networks, and combinatorics. Connected graphs can be bad expanders, can have very large diameter, and possibly contain no long paths. In contrast, we show that if G is an n-vertex connected graph then typically G* has edge expansion Omega(1/(log n)), diameter O(log n), vertex expansion Omega(1/(log n)), and contains a path of length Omega(n), where for the last two properties we additionally assume that G has bounded maximum degree. Moreover, we show that if G has bounded degeneracy, then typically the mixing time of the lazy random walk on G* is O(log^2(n)). All these results are asymptotically tight.

[1]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  The evolution of the mixing rate of a simple random walk on the giant component of a random graph , 2008, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[2]  Nicholas C. Wormald,et al.  The mixing time of the giant component of a random graph , 2006, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[3]  Shang-Hua Teng,et al.  Smoothed Analysis of the Condition Numbers and Growth Factors of Matrices , 2003, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[4]  Benny Sudakov,et al.  On smoothed analysis in dense graphs and formulas , 2006, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[5]  R. Durrett Random Graph Dynamics: References , 2006 .

[6]  Uriel Feige,et al.  Heuristics for Semirandom Graph Problems , 2001, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Jian Ding,et al.  Sensitivity of mixing times , 2013 .

[8]  Tao Lei,et al.  The Mixing Time of the Newman-Watts Small-World Model , 2012, Advances in Applied Probability.

[9]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The Diameter of a Cycle Plus a Random Matching , 1988, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[10]  Eli Upfal,et al.  Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  L. Pósa,et al.  Hamiltonian circuits in random graphs , 1976, Discret. Math..

[12]  John Dunagan,et al.  Smoothed analysis of the perceptron algorithm for linear programming , 2002, SODA '02.

[13]  János Komlós,et al.  The longest path in a random graph , 1981, Comb..

[14]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  Coloring Random and Semi-Random k-Colorable Graphs , 1995, J. Algorithms.

[15]  M. Newman,et al.  Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  Abraham D. Flaxman,et al.  Expansion and Lack Thereof in Randomly Perturbed Graphs , 2007, Internet Math..

[17]  Benny Sudakov,et al.  How many random edges make a dense hypergraph non-2-colorable? , 2008 .

[18]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On the mixing time of a simple random walk on the super critical percolation cluster , 2000 .

[19]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  On smoothed k-CNF formulas and the Walksat algorithm , 2009, SODA.

[20]  B. Reed,et al.  Faster Mixing and Small Bottlenecks , 2006 .

[21]  Uriel Feige,et al.  Refuting Smoothed 3CNF Formulas , 2007, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[22]  Shang-Hua Teng,et al.  Smoothed analysis of algorithms: why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time , 2001, STOC '01.

[23]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Random Graph Dynamics (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics) , 2006 .

[24]  Tom Bohman,et al.  How many random edges make a dense graph hamiltonian? , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[25]  Michael Krivelevich,et al.  Coloring complete bipartite graphs from random lists , 2006, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[26]  Terence Tao,et al.  The condition number of a randomly perturbed matrix , 2007, STOC '07.

[27]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Conductance and the rapid mixing property for Markov chains: the approximation of permanent resolved , 1988, STOC '88.

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  Renormalization Group Analysis of the Small-World Network Model , 1999, cond-mat/9903357.

[29]  Benny Sudakov,et al.  The phase transition in random graphs: A simple proof , 2012, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[30]  Tom Bohman,et al.  How many random edges make a dense graph hamiltonian? , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[31]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  The diameter of randomly perturbed digraphs and some applications , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[32]  B. Bollobás On generalized graphs , 1965 .

[33]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  Probability And Computing , 2005 .

[34]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  Crossing numbers of random graphs , 2002, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[35]  V. Climenhaga Markov chains and mixing times , 2013 .