Large-Area Aerodynamic Control for High-Altitude Long- Endurance Sensor Platforms

The use of large-area aerodynamic control schemes to enable high-altitude long-endurance sensor platforms is investigated. The focus is on a vehicle with a joined-wing design. The vehicle has two performance shortcomings that are considered typical of the broader class of high-altitude long-endurance vehicles. The first is minimum roll rate at landing due to the large amount of roll damping associated with these configurations. It is shown that multiple distributed control surfaces can help meet the roll rate requirements. The second is sensitivity of takeoff gross weight to maximum lift-to-drag ratio. Notional mission requirements drive the fuel fraction to high levels and small changes in lift-to-drag ratio can enable large changes in the vehicle weight through reduced fuel requirements. It is shown that the same technology used to satisfy the roll requirement can also be used to actively control the twist and camber during cruise and can have a moderate impact on the vehicle weight or endurance.

[1]  W. Keats Wilkie,et al.  An overview of composite actuators with piezoceramic fibers , 2002 .

[2]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Active Warping Control of a Joined Wing/Tail Airplane Configuration , 2003 .

[3]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Application of Active-Aeroelastic-Wing Technology to a Joined-Wing Sensorcraft , 2002 .

[4]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Maneuver Trim Optimization Techniques for Active Aeroelastic Wings , 2000 .

[5]  Edmund Pendleton,et al.  Active Aeroelastic Wing Flight Research Program: Technical Program and Model Analytical Development , 2000 .

[6]  Louis V. Schmidt,et al.  Introduction to Aircraft Flight Dynamics , 1998 .

[7]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design , 2006 .

[8]  Robert E. Skelton,et al.  Tendon control deployment of tensegrity structures , 1998, Smart Structures.

[9]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes , 2003 .

[10]  G. Miller.  An active flexible wing multi-disciplinary design optimization method , 1994 .

[11]  Robert A. Canfield,et al.  A JOINED-WING STRUCTURAL WEIGHT MODELING STUDY , 2002 .

[12]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing program: final overview , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  A. Lyrintzis,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of a morphing airfoil using energy as an objective , 2007 .

[14]  J. E. Lamar,et al.  A vortex-lattice method for the mean camber shapes of trimmed noncoplanar planforms with minimum vortex drag , 1976 .

[15]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Ideal Lift Distributions and Flap Angles for Adaptive Wings , 2004 .

[16]  Gregory W. Reich,et al.  Simulation-based research and development: technology assessment process , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Edward Nicholas Shipley.  Static Aeroelasticity Considerations in Aerodynamic Adaptation of Wings for Low Drag , 2006 .

[18]  J. Wolkovitch,et al.  The joined wing - An overview , 1985 .

[19]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .