A semiotic interpretation of genre: Judgments as an example

Abstract Genre has been a critical issue in discourse analysis as well as in other disciplines. Based on a literature review of the concept of genre and taking judgments as one type of genre in legal settings, the present study provides a corpus-based insight into the nature of genre. The literature review per se reveals that genre has one typical feature of a sign, that is, being subject to multiple and alternative interpretations; in other words, genre as a sign may have various interpretants. The present study unravels the actual generic structures, distinguishes different types of generic structures within the given genre, and then defines the dominant generic structure of judgments in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China. This study also examines and contrasts the generic structure potential of judgments in each jurisdiction. In addition, the variation of Mainland China's judgments over time is briefly discussed. Comparing the generic structures of judgments among the three jurisdictions, as well as the structures of judgments in Mainland China over time, the paper argues that genre also has the essential features of a sign, that is, the characteristics of temporality and spatiality.

[1]  M. Hoey.  On the surface of discourse , 1983 .

[2]  Vivian Zamel,et al.  The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction , 1984 .

[3]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[4]  Richard Holmes.  Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines , 1997 .

[5]  N. Fairclough.  Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. , 2001 .

[6]  K. Hyland,et al.  GRADUATES GRATITUDE: THE GENERIC STRUCTURE OF DISSERTATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS , 2004 .

[7]  John M. Swales,et al.  Occluded genres in the academy : The case of the submission letter , 1996 .

[8]  D. Hymes.  Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[9]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[10]  Joseph E. Grimes,et al.  The Thread of Discourse , 1984 .

[11]  Christopher S. Butler,et al.  Structure and Function – A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories , 2003 .

[12]  A. Hopkins,et al.  A GENRE-BASED INVESTIGATION OF THE DISCUSSION SECTIONS IN ARTICLES AND DISSERTATIONS , 1988 .

[13]  D. Hymes.  Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life , 2009 .

[14]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Genres and Registers of Discourse , 1997 .

[15]  P. M. Howe.  The problem of the problem question in english for academic legal purposes , 1990 .

[16]  N. Frye.  Anatomy of Criticism , 1958 .

[18]  Le Cheng,et al.  Contrastive analysis of Chinese and American court judgments , 2008 .

[19]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .