Early detection of cancer recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT can make a difference in diagnosis and patient care.

Early detection of recurrence is clinically important and can improve the prognosis and survival of patients with cancer. CT, considered the primary method of investigation because of its low cost and widespread availability, provides high-resolution anatomic details but may underestimate the actual tumor burden by overlooking small tumor clusters in areas of distorted anatomy after treatment. 18F-FDG PET is an effective whole-body imaging technique that detects metabolic changes preceding structural findings. However, the specificity of PET is impaired by false-positive or equivocal results attributable to the lack of precise anatomic landmarks and to sites of increased 18F-FDG uptake of nonmalignant etiology. PET/CT provides fused images that demonstrate the complementary roles of functional and anatomic assessments in the diagnosis of cancer recurrence through the precise localization of suspected 18F-FDG foci and their characterization as malignant or benign. In addition to the accurate diagnosis and definition of the whole extent of recurrent cancer, PET/CT has an impact on patient management because it can assist in defining potential candidates for surgery for cure, planning the appropriate surgical or radiotherapy approach, and referring patients with unresectable disease to other therapeutic options.

[1]  L. Fleming Playing the Waiting Game … The Asymptomatic Patient with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Detected Only by Rising Ca125 Levels , 2001, Scottish medical journal.

[2]  E. Wardelmann,et al.  Integrated PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  A. Kuten,et al.  Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  A. J. Fischman,et al.  Evaluation of pancreatic carcinoma with FDG PET , 2001, Abdominal Imaging.

[5]  D Visvikis,et al.  Positron emission tomography and colorectal cancer , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  C. Snyderman,et al.  Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging of Recurrent Thyroid Cancer , 2003, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  Direct Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma , 2003 .

[8]  A. Figer,et al.  Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  P. Clavien,et al.  Does the Novel PET/CT Imaging Modality Impact on the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer of the Liver? , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[10]  B. Nowak,et al.  2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  Ora Israel,et al.  Cancer Recurrence: Diagnostic Value and Impact on Patient Management , 2004 .

[12]  É. Vinet,et al.  Regional treatment of metastasis: surgery of colorectal liver metastases. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  E. Martin,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an adjunct to carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with presumed recurrent colorectal cancer and nondiagnostic radiologic workup. , 2001, Surgery.

[14]  Osman Ratib,et al.  Comparison between 18F-FDG PET, in-line PET/CT, and software fusion for restaging of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer. , 2002, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[17]  James A Brink,et al.  Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level I trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  David Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Management of Recurrent Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  Y. Shiau,et al.  Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2001, Anticancer research.

[20]  M. Blaufox,et al.  A meta-analysis of FDG-PET for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  Michael N. Maisey,et al.  Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  R. Wahl,et al.  CT appearance of bone metastases detected with FDG PET as part of the same PET/CT examination. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  Elliot K Fishman,et al.  Combined PET/CT for detecting recurrent ovarian cancer limited to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  Lale Kostakoglu,et al.  Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  C. Nanni,et al.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Ora Israel,et al.  Is 18F-FDG PET/CT useful for imaging and management of patients with suspected occult recurrence of cancer? , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  E. Yoshikawa,et al.  Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  M. Phelps,et al.  Performance of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography and Integrated PET/CT in Restaged Breast Cancer Patients , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[29]  R. Wahl,et al.  Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis with dual-modality PET/CT: initial results , 2005, European Radiology.

[31]  P. Valk,et al.  Whole-body PET imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in management of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[32]  M. Duffy,et al.  Clinical Uses of Tumor Markers: A Critical Review , 2001, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[33]  D C Young,et al.  Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases? , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[34]  D. Grisaru,et al.  THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF 18F-FLUORODEOXY-GLUCOSE PET/CT IN PATIENTS WITH GYNECOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[35]  W Steinbrich,et al.  Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT. , 1988, Radiology.

[36]  D. Ferrigno,et al.  Serum biomarkers facilitate the recognition of early- stage cancer and may guide the selection of surgical candidates: a study of carcinoembryonic antigen and tissue polypeptide antigen in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[37]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. , 2004, Radiology.

[38]  E. Hauth,et al.  Evaluation of integrated whole-body PET/CT in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[39]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Unexplained rising carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer: the utility of positron emission tomography (PET). , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[41]  B. Böhm,et al.  Does methodic long-term follow-up affect survival after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma? , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[42]  I. Fogelman Osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer: is not seeing believing? , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[43]  L. Ellis,et al.  Long-term Survival After An Aggressive Surgical Approach in Patients With Breast Cancer Hepatic Metastases , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[44]  J. Rubins,et al.  Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative-intent therapy. , 2003, Chest.

[45]  L G Strauss,et al.  The applications of PET in clinical oncology. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  O. Belohlávek,et al.  The role of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[47]  S. Larson,et al.  Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. , 2000, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[48]  V. Lowe,et al.  Persistent or recurrent bronchogenic carcinoma: detection with PET and 2-[F-18]-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1994, Radiology.

[49]  A. Hogg,et al.  The Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study , 2002 .

[50]  P. Sagar,et al.  Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[51]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  E. Even-Sapir Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  G. Cook,et al.  Nuclear Medicine Annual 2002 , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[54]  A. Kuten,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose‐Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Carcinoma of the Larynx: Diagnostic Accuracy and Impact on Clinical Management , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[55]  W. Pavlosky,et al.  Thyroid-stimulating hormone-stimulated fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of recurrence in 131I-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma. , 2006, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[56]  F. Fazio,et al.  Advanced ovarian carcinoma: usefulness of [(18)F]FDG-PET in combination with CT for lesion detection after primary treatment. , 2003, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[57]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Positron emission tomography scanning: current and future applications. , 2002, Annual review of medicine.

[58]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[59]  J. Ajani,et al.  Imaging with indium111-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody ZCE-025 of recurrent colorectal or carcinoembryonic antigen-producing cancer in patients with rising serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and occult metastases. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.