Evaluasi Human Machine Interface Menggunakan Kriteria Usability Pada Sistem E-learning Perguruan Tinggi

Integration HMI with usability in user interface design process is a standart of the success of a website. The design process is done through the approach to the end user to find a problem solution of human machine interface phenomena. It can also generate the maximum level of satisfaction and success of implementation of the website. The purpose of this research is to evaluate HMI using usabilitycriteria to know the application of HMI concept in e-learning and provide proposals for improvements to the HMI. Questionnaire Data were processed using a descriptive analysis and methods of CFA to know the variables that are weakest and which indicators have an important role in shaping the research variables. Evaluation results indicate the application concept of HMI in the e-learning had been done but not the maximum. Data analysis of the results obtained that the main problem lies in the accessibility criteria in the meantime indicator latent variables from forming error prevention, learnability, memorability, visibility and accessibility of influential factor loading values indicated significantly (unidimensionalitas) in shaping the criteria of latent variables in first-order CFA. The end result of this research is the proposal of improvement as a HMI solution in the form of principles and technicsuser interface design. This solution is focused on the development of standards for the quality of the interface in e-learning systems and not on the digital learning content presented on the e-learning system. Keyword s : Descriptive analisis; Human machine interface; Usability; Confirmatory factor analisys; Elearning

[1]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Foundations of Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: An Introduction , 2015 .

[2]  Tom Carey,et al.  ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .

[3]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[5]  Patricia A. Chalmers,et al.  The role of cognitive theory in human-computer interface , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  S. R. Sharma.  Methods of Educational Research , 2004 .

[7]  Cristian Hofmann,et al.  Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  John L. Campbell,et al.  The development of human factors design guidelines , 1996 .

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[10]  Jeffrey Johnson.  GUI Bloopers 2.0: Common User Interface Design Don'ts and Dos , 2007 .

[11]  Yu-chu Yeh,et al.  Development of design criteria and evaluation scale for web-based learning platforms , 2009 .

[12]  Asil Oztekin,et al.  UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for eLearning systems by criticality metric analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Harry Hochheiser,et al.  Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction , 2008 .

[14]  Selim Zaim,et al.  A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning systems , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Nigel Bevan.  International standards for usability should be more widely used , 2009 .

[16]  Naouel Moha,et al.  Remote usability evaluation of web interfaces , 2006 .

[17]  Theresa O'Connell,et al.  The Usability Engineering Behins User-Centered Processes for Web Site Development Lifecycles , 2007 .

[18]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems – Foundations , 2006 .