Concept empiricism: A methodological critique

Thanks to Barsalou's, Damasio's, Glenberg's, Prinz' and others' work, neo-empiricism is gaining a deserved recognition in the psychology and philosophy of concepts. I argue, however, that neo-empiricists have underestimated the difficulty of providing evidence against the amodal approach to concepts and higher cognition. I highlight three key problems: the difficulty of sorting out amodal predictions from neo-empiricist predictions, the difficulty of finding experimental tasks that are not best solved by imagery and the difficulty of generalizing findings concerning a given cognitive process in a given context to other cognitive processes or other contexts. Finally, solutions to these three problems are considered.

[1]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[2]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual tasks , 1999 .

[3]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: A case study of mathematics , 2004 .

[4]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[5]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[6]  John R. Anderson.  Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. , 1978 .

[7]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[8]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Medin,et al.  Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  A. Markman,et al.  Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[14]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in property verification , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[15]  George Berkeley,et al.  A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge, 1734 , 1971 .

[16]  S. Basescu,et al.  In Search of a Theory , 1978 .

[17]  P. Nidditch,et al.  Enquiries: Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals , 1966 .

[18]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[19]  S. Vereza.  Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[20]  S. Rickless,et al.  A TREATISE CONCERNING THE PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE , 2003 .

[21]  A. Damasio.  Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[22]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[23]  Kenneth M. Ford,et al.  Android epistemology , 1995 .

[24]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[25]  Abstract number and arithmetic in young children , 2005 .

[26]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[27]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Mental imagery: In search of a theory , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Machine as mind , 1995 .

[30]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. , 2000 .

[31]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[32]  M. Gazzaniga.  The cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition , 2004 .

[33]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  Language and Thought , 1998 .

[34]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. , 1981 .

[36]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Representing Properties Locally , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? , 1999 .

[38]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2003 .

[39]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Multi-modal simulation in conceptual processing , 2005 .

[41]  J. Prinz.  Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis , 2004 .

[42]  L. Betzig.  Human nature : a critical reader , 1997 .

[43]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[44]  E. Machery.  100 years of psychology of concepts: the theoretical notion of concept and its operationalization. , 2007, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[45]  Lynn Andrea Stein,et al.  Imagination and situated cognition , 1991, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[46]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  ROLE OF MENTAL IMAGERY IN A PROPERTY VERIFICATION TASK: FMRI EVIDENCE FOR PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[47]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..

[48]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[49]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Computation and cognition , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[50]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[51]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[52]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Efficient creativity: constraint-guided conceptual combination , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[54]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[55]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Compositionality and the Pragmatics of Conceptual Combination , 2005 .

[56]  G. Seagrim.  Furnishing the mind , 1980 .

[57]  S. Dehaene,et al.  FROM NUMBER NEURONS TO MENTAL ARITHMETIC : THE , 2003 .

[58]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Towards a procedural understanding of semantics , 1976 .

[60]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental imagery , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[61]  J. Mandler.  How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. , 1992, Psychological review.

[62]  Edouard Machery,et al.  Concepts Are Not a Natural Kind* , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[63]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[64]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[65]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[67]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[68]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[69]  S. Thompson-Schill.  Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where” , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  E. Spelke,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge , 2004 .

[71]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.