Sparse Wave Packets Discriminate Motor Tasks in EEG–based BCIs

We propose a novel non–linear source separation technique for single–channel, multi–trial Electroencephalogram (EEG). First, a generative model is posited as the generating process behind bandpassed traces. In particular, the inputs are conceived as the state variable of a switching mechanism that samples temporal snippets from two distributions corresponding to a background component and a phasic event or wave packet counterpart. In order to non–linearly separate the sources, we propose a neurophysiologically principled, non– linear mapping to a space of ℓ2–norms via the Embedding Transform. In this way, the estimated phasic event component— an ideal time series where neuromodulations are emphasized— is isolated for further processing. The algorithm is tested on the Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Competition 4 dataset 2a. The results not only surpass classic power–based measures, but also highlight the discriminative nature of scale–specific wave packets in motor imagery tasks. The inherent switching mechanism that generates the traces suggests a transient, temporally sparse feature of the neuromodulations that can be further exploited in applications where compression is advantageous.

[1]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[2]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Imaging Brain Function With EEG: Advanced Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Electroencephalographic Signals , 2012 .

[5]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[7]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[9]  Saeid Sanei,et al.  EEG signal processing , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Review of the BCI Competition IV , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  A. Walker Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields , 1982 .

[13]  Michael S. Okun,et al.  A Marked Point Process Framework for Extracellular Electrical Potentials , 2017, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[14]  F. Mormann,et al.  Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients , 2000 .

[15]  Barrie W. Jervis,et al.  A Fundamental Investigation of the Composition of Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  José Carlos Príncipe,et al.  The Embedding Transform. A Novel Analysis of Non-Stationarity in the EEG , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[17]  James M. Shine,et al.  Analysis and Prediction of the Freezing of Gait Using EEG Brain Dynamics , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.