Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.

OBJECTIVES To examine the performance of two recently developed preference-based instruments-the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire Youth version (EQ-5D-Y)-in assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Australian adolescents. METHODS An online survey including the CHU9D and the EQ-5D-Y, self-reported health status, and a series of sociodemographic questions was developed for administration to a community-based sample of adolescents (aged 11-17 years). Individual responses to both instruments were translated into utilities using scoring algorithms derived from the Australian adult general population. RESULTS A total of 2020 adolescents completed the online survey. The mean ± SD utilities of the CHU9D and the EQ-5D-Y were very similar (0.82 ± 0.13 and 0.83 ± 0.19, respectively), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.80) suggested good levels of agreement. Both instruments were able to discriminate according to varying levels of self-reported health status (P < 0.001). Although exhibiting good levels of agreement overall, some wide divergences were apparent at an individual level. CONCLUSIONS The study results are encouraging and illustrate the potential for both the CHU9D and the EQ-5D-Y to be more widely used for measuring and valuing the HRQOL of adolescent populations in Australia and internationally. Generating adolescent-specific scoring algorithms pertaining to each instrument and an empirical comparison of the resulting utilities is a natural next step. More evidence is required from the application of the CHU9D and the EQ-5D-Y in specific patient groups in adolescent health settings to inform the choice of instrument for measuring and valuing the HRQOL for the economic evaluation of adolescent health care treatments and services.

[1]  R Graham-Brown,et al.  A multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of ion-exchange water softeners for the treatment of eczema in children: the Softened Water Eczema Trial (SWET). , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[2]  D. Streiner,et al.  Sleep and quality of life in clinical medicine , 2008 .

[3]  J. Brazier,et al.  Whose values in health? An empirical comparison of the application of adolescent and adult values for the CHU-9D and AQOL-6D in the Australian adolescent general population. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[4]  J. Brazier,et al.  Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.

[5]  S. Riedel-Heller,et al.  The long‐term cost‐effectiveness of obesity prevention interventions: systematic literature review , 2012, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[6]  James G. Wright,et al.  A Parent-Child Dyad Approach to the Assessment of Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Asthma , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[7]  F J Gilbert,et al.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[8]  J. Brazier,et al.  A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. , 2004, Health economics.

[9]  Deborah J Street,et al.  Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[10]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  BMI, Health Behaviors, and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: A School-Based Study , 2014, Pediatrics.

[11]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[12]  John Brazier,et al.  Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health-State Values for the Child Health Utility-9D Using Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling. , 2016, Health economics.

[13]  Michael Herdman,et al.  Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  J. Kelly,et al.  Sleep and Quality of Life in Children , 2008 .

[15]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  Adolescence: a foundation for future health , 2012, The Lancet.

[16]  Jessica Zhang,et al.  Young Australians: Their Health and Wellbeing 2011. , 2011 .

[17]  W. Thomson,et al.  The potential of the Child Health Utility 9D Index as an outcome measure for child dental health , 2014, BMC oral health.

[18]  E. Caine,et al.  Sleep Duration and Quality of Life in Young Rural Chinese Residents , 2013, Behavioral sleep medicine.

[19]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methods , 2008, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  John Brazier,et al.  An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[21]  S. Walters,et al.  Physical activity, quality of life, weight status and diet in adolescents , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  Katherine Stevens,et al.  Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  G. Holmbeck,et al.  Adolescent health psychology. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  Jenny Morris,et al.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[25]  M. Drummond Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[26]  J. Brazier,et al.  Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale , 2012, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[27]  E. Frew,et al.  Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6–7 years: a comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y—the WAVES Pilot Study , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[28]  R. Edwards,et al.  EQ-5D for the assessment of health-related quality of life and resource allocation in children: a systematic methodological review. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[29]  Alessio Zambon,et al.  The Family Affluence Scale as a Measure of National Wealth: Validation of an Adolescent Self-Report Measure , 2006 .

[30]  R. Sigal,et al.  Overweight and obese teenagers: why is adolescence a critical period? , 2012, Pediatric obesity.

[31]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[32]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study , 2010, Quality of Life Research.