Prior data assisted compressed sensing: a novel MR imaging strategy for real time tracking of lung tumors.

PURPOSE Hybrid radiotherapy-MRI devices promise real time tracking of moving tumors to focus the radiation portals to the tumor during irradiation. This approach will benefit from the increased temporal resolution of MRI's data acquisition and reconstruction. In this work, the authors propose a novel spatial-temporal compressed sensing (CS) imaging strategy for the real time MRI--prior data assisted compressed sensing (PDACS), which aims to improve the image quality of the conventional CS without significantly increasing reconstruction times. METHODS Conventional 2D CS requires a random sampling of partial k-space data, as well as an iterative reconstruction that simultaneously enforces the image's sparsity in a transform domain as well as maintains the fidelity to the acquired k-space. PDACS method requires the additional acquisition of the prior data, and for reconstruction, it additionally enforces fidelity to the prior k-space domain similar to viewsharing. In this work, the authors evaluated the proposed PDACS method by comparing its results to those obtained from the 2D CS and viewsharing methods when performed individually. All three methods are used to reconstruct images from lung cancer patients whose tumors move and who are likely to benefit from lung tumor tracking. The patients are scanned, using a 3T MRI, under free breathing using the fully sampled k-space with 2D dynamic bSSFP sequence in a sagittal plane containing lung tumor. These images form a reference set for the evaluation of the partial k-space methods. To create partial k-space, the fully sampled k-space is retrospectively undersampled to obtain a range of acquisition acceleration factors, and reconstructed with 2D-CS, PDACS, and viewshare methods. For evaluation, metrics assessing global image artifacts as well as tumor contour shape fidelity are determined from the reconstructed images. These analyses are performed both for the original 3T images and those at a simulated 0.5T equivalent noise level. RESULTS In the 3.0T images, the PDACS strategy is shown to give superior results compared to viewshare and conventional 2D CS using all metrics. The 2D-CS tends to perform better than viewshare at the low acceleration factors, while the opposite is true at the high acceleration factors. At simulated 0.5T images, PDACS method performs only marginally better than the viewsharing method, both of which are superior compared to 2D CS. The PDACS image reconstruction time (0.3 s/image) is similar to that of the conventional 2D CS. CONCLUSIONS The PDACS method can potentially improve the real time tracking of moving tumors by significantly increasing MRI's data acquisition speeds. In 3T images, the PDACS method does provide a benefit over the other two methods in terms of both the overall image quality and the ability to accurately and automatically contour the tumor shape. MRI's data acquisition may be accelerated using the simpler viewsharing strategy at the lower, 0.5T magnetic field, as the marginal benefit of the PDACS method may not justify its additional reconstruction times.

[1]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Artifact and noise suppression in GRAPPA imaging using improved k‐space coil calibration and variable density sampling , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Petros Martirosian,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lung Tissue: Influence of Body Positioning, Breathing and Oxygen Inhalation on Signal Decay Using Multi-Echo Gradient-Echo Sequences , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Satyapal Rathee,et al.  Evaluation of a lung tumor autocontouring algorithm for intrafractional tumor tracking using low-field MRI: a phantom study. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  MRI/linac integration. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  B. Fallone,et al.  First MR images obtained during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR system. , 2009, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  X Hu,et al.  Continuous Update with Random Encoding (CURE): A New Strategy for Dynamic Imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  G. Laub,et al.  3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  Accelerated Dynamic MRI Exploiting Sparsity and Low-Rank Structure: k-t SLR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al.  Real-Time Compressive Sensing MRI Reconstruction Using GPU Computing and Split Bregman Methods , 2012, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[13]  B G Fallone,et al.  Skin dose in longitudinal and transverse linac-MRIs using Monte Carlo and realistic 3D MRI field models. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  J. J. van Vaals,et al.  “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  T. Redpath Signal-to-noise ratio in MRI. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  k‐t FOCUSS: A general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[18]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[19]  D. L. Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  MRI-guided tumor tracking in lung cancer radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  B. Fallone,et al.  MTF behavior of compressed sensing MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[22]  S P M Crijns,et al.  Proof of concept of MRI-guided tracked radiation delivery: tracking one-dimensional motion , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Rasmus Larsen,et al.  Three-dimensional MRI-linac intra-fraction guidance using multiple orthogonal cine-MRI planes , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.