Molecular Grading of Ductal Carcinoma In situ of the Breast

Purpose: Increased incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with mammographic screening for breast cancer has emphasized the challenges of managing this condition. The aim of this study was to identify informative clinical indicators of DCIS biology by molecular profiling. Experimental Design: Areas of in situ carcinoma, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and benign epithelium were microdissected from 46 invasive breast cancers. Oligonucleotide probes showing differential expression between DCIS associated with grade 1 and 3 invasive cancer were identified by microarray-based gene expression profiling. Expression at these probes was used to define a “molecular grade” subcategorization of all samples. The genomic basis of molecular grade was examined by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clinical course was examined in a cohort of 134 patients with DCIS treated by surgery alone. Results: DCIS samples were designated as low or high molecular grade based on expression at 173 probes. The low molecular grade subgroup included low (n = 10) and intermediate (n = 11) nuclear grade DCIS as well as all samples of atypical ductal hyperplasia (n = 4) and benign epithelium (n = 7). The high molecular grade subgroup included DCIS of intermediate (n = 7) and high (n = 19) nuclear grade. The character and degree of genomic aberration were distinct between molecular grade subgroups. A classification tree model including nuclear grade and Ki67 score accurately predicted molecular grade for 95.7% of samples. In an independent cohort, this showed a pattern of rapid disease recurrence for high molecular grade DCIS. Conclusions: Molecular profiling indicates a binary grading scheme for DCIS. This practical approach has potential to improve clinical evaluation of DCIS.

[1]  K Vajda,et al.  [Prognostic factors in breast cancer]. , 1998, Orvosi hetilap.

[2]  W. Gregory,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: Assessment of necrosis and nuclear morphology and their association with biological markers , 1995, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Genome-wide gene-expression profiles of breast-cancer cells purified with laser microbeam microdissection: identification of genes associated with progression and metastasis. , 2004, International journal of oncology.

[4]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  K. Byth,et al.  Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  Yonatan Aumann,et al.  Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis. , 2006 .

[7]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Duct carcinoma in situ: 227 cases without microinvasion. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[8]  Joshy George,et al.  Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[9]  R. Salunga,et al.  Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Schultz,et al.  Fifteen-year results of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Consensus Conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ. The Consensus Conference Committee. , 1997, Cancer.

[12]  M. Gail,et al.  The promise and peril of surrogate end points in cancer research , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[14]  as named below Consensus Conference on the Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ , 1997, Human pathology.

[15]  Shoker,et al.  DCIS grading schemes and clinical implications , 1999, Histopathology.

[16]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. , 1994, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[17]  J. Coyne,et al.  Comparison of cytomorphological and architectural heterogeneity in mammographically‐detected ductal carcinoma in situ , 1996, Histopathology.

[18]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by gene expression profiling , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[19]  P. Brown,et al.  Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G. Noël,et al.  [Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-17]. , 1999, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[21]  S. Feig,et al.  Heterogeneity of intraductai carcinoma of the breast , 1989 .

[22]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[23]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  A. Leong,et al.  Biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ and concurrent infiltrating carcinoma. A comparison of eight contemporary grading systems. , 2001, American journal of clinical pathology.

[25]  K. Malone,et al.  Age-Specific Incidence Rates of In situ Breast Carcinomas by Histologic Type, 1980 to 2001 , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[26]  Kay Nieselt,et al.  Progression-specific genes identified by expression profiling of matched ductal carcinomas in situ and invasive breast tumors, combining laser capture microdissection and oligonucleotide microarray analysis. , 2006, Cancer research.

[27]  M. Morrow Breast-Conserving Treatment With or Without Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Ten-Year Results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Phase III Trial 10853—A Study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group , 2007 .

[28]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[29]  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight‐year update of protocol B‐17 , 2000, Cancer.

[30]  C. Quinn,et al.  Cytological and architectural heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1997, Journal of clinical pathology.

[31]  S. Martino,et al.  The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[33]  Yonatan Aumann,et al.  Efficient Calculation of Interval Scores for DNA Copy Number Data Analysis , 2005, RECOMB.

[34]  J. Palazzo,et al.  The prognostic significance of multiple morphologic features and biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2004, Cancer.

[35]  W. Dupont,et al.  The natural history of low‐grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long‐term follow‐up , 2005, Cancer.

[36]  L. Tabár,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[37]  J. Peterse,et al.  Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853--a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[40]  M. J. Silverstein,et al.  Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ , 1995, The Lancet.

[41]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[42]  S. Feig,et al.  Heterogeneity of intraductal carcinoma of the breast. , 1989, Cancer.