Long-Term Outcomes of Internet-Based Self-Management Support in Adults With Asthma: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Long-term asthma management falls short of the goals set by international guidelines. The Internet is proposed as an attractive medium to support guided self-management in asthma. Recently, in a multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled parallel trial with a follow-up period of 1 year, patients were allocated Internet-based self-management (IBSM) support (Internet group [IG]) or usual care (UC) alone. IBSM support was automatically terminated after 12 months of follow-up. In this study, IBSM support has been demonstrated to improve asthma-related quality of life, asthma control, lung function, and the number of symptom-free days as compared to UC. IBSM support was based on known key components for effective self-management and included weekly asthma control monitoring and treatment advice, online and group education, and communication (both online and offline) with a respiratory nurse. Objective The objective of the study was to assess the long-term effects of providing patients 1 year of IBSM support as compared to UC alone. Methods Two hundred adults with physician-diagnosed asthma (3 or more months of inhaled corticosteroids prescribed in the past year) from 37 general practices and 1 academic outpatient department who previously participated were invited by letter for additional follow-up at 1.5 years after finishing the study. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) were completed by 107 participants (60 UC participants and 47 IG participants). A minimal clinical important difference in both questionnaires is 0.5 on a 7-point scale. Results At 30 months after baseline, a sustained and significant difference in terms of asthma-related quality of life of 0.29 (95% CI 0.01-0.57) and asthma control of -0.33 (95% CI -0.61 to -0.05) was found in favor of the IBSM group. No such differences were found for inhaled corticosteroid dosage or for lung function, measured as forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Conclusions Improvements in asthma-related quality of life and asthma control were sustained in patients who received IBSM support for 1 year, even up to 1.5 years after terminating support. Future research should be focused on implementation of IBSM on a wider scale within routine asthma care. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 79864465; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN79864465 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6J4VHhPk4).

[1]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[2]  Martyn R Partridge,et al.  British Guideline on the Management of Asthma , 2008, Thorax.

[3]  Peter J Sterk,et al.  Internet-based self-management offers an opportunity to achieve better asthma control in adolescents. , 2007, Chest.

[4]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. , 2009, Health affairs.

[5]  Domján Andrea,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (WMA) - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects , 2014 .

[6]  Sheryl Magzamen,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Inhaled Bronchodilator Use and Weekly Feedback about Asthma Management: An Open-Group, Short-Term Pilot Study of the Impact on Asthma Control , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  G. Eysenbach.  CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Linda Abetz,et al.  Identifying 'well-controlled' and 'not well-controlled' asthma using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. , 2006, Respiratory medicine.

[9]  Colin McCowan,et al.  Results of a national asthma campaign survey of primary care in Scotland. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  K. Khunti,et al.  Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Price,et al.  Understanding the potential role of mobile phone‐based monitoring on asthma self‐management: qualitative study , 2007, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[12]  A. Deschildre,et al.  [Assessing asthma control?]. , 2006, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[13]  Klas Svensson,et al.  Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. , 2005, Respiratory medicine.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Telehealthcare for asthma: a Cochrane review , 2011, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[16]  L. Tarassenko,et al.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  K. Rabe,et al.  Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study , 2010, Respiratory research.

[18]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Understanding what helps or hinders asthma action plan use: a systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[20]  Michel Wensing,et al.  What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence‐based practice , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[21]  Martyn R Partridge,et al.  Do practices comply with key recommendations of the British Asthma Guideline? If not, why not? , 2007, Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group.

[22]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  Clinical efficacy of web-based versus standard asthma self-management. , 2012, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[23]  Peter J Sterk,et al.  Internet-Based Self-management Plus Education Compared With Usual Care in Asthma , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[25]  P. Demoly,et al.  Prevalence of asthma control among adults in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK , 2009, European Respiratory Review.

[26]  M J Hensley,et al.  Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  A. Buist,et al.  Validation of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1999, Chest.

[28]  R. Pauwels,et al.  GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION , 1996 .

[29]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Internet-based tapering of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial , 2011, Thorax.

[30]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  C. van Weel,et al.  Self-management of asthma in general practice, asthma control and quality of life: a randomised controlled trial , 2003, Thorax.

[32]  H. Kuo,et al.  A mobile telephone-based interactive self-care system improves asthma control , 2010, European Respiratory Journal.

[33]  Kevin B Weiss,et al.  Worldwide severity and control of asthma in children and adults: the global asthma insights and reality surveys. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.