A Recommender System to Support the Scholarly Communication Process

The number of researchers, articles, journals, conferences, funding opportunities, and other such scholarly resources continues to grow every year and at an increasing rate. Many services have emerged to support scholars in navigating particular aspects of this resource-rich environment. Some commercial publishers provide recommender and alert services for the articles and journals in their digital libraries. Similarly, numerous noncommercial social bookmarking services have emerged for citation sharing. While these services do provide some support, they lack an understanding of the various problem-solving scenarios that researchers face daily. Example scenarios, to name a few, include when a scholar is in search of an article related to another article of interest, when a scholar is in search of a potential collaborator for a funding opportunity, when a scholar is in search of an optimal venue to which to submit their article, and when a scholar, in the role of an editor, is in search of referees to review an article. All of these example scenarios can be represented as a problem in information filtering by means of context-sensitive recommendation. This article presents an overview of a context-sensitive recommender system to support the scholarly communication process that is based on the standards and technology set forth by the Semantic Web initiative.

[1]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks , 2003, KDD '03.

[2]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  Exposing multi-relational networks to single-relational network analysis algorithms , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[3]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  E. Garfield Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  Grammar-based random walkers in semantic networks , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  A Multi-Relational Network to Support the Scholarly Communication Process , 2006, ArXiv.

[7]  J. Hirsch An index to quantify an individual's scientific output , 2005 .

[8]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Automatic metadata generation using associative networks , 2008, TOIS.

[9]  Jeremy J. Carroll,et al.  Named graphs, provenance and trust , 2005, WWW '05.

[10]  Johan Bollen,et al.  An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers , 2006, CIKM '08.

[11]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Protocol , 2002 .

[12]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[13]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Towards usage-based impact metrics: first results from the mesur project. , 2008, JCDL '08.

[14]  Jeremy J. Carroll,et al.  Resource description framework (rdf) concepts and abstract syntax , 2003 .

[15]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Information retrieval by constrained spreading activation in semantic networks , 1987, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Johan Bollen,et al.  A practical ontology for the large-scale modeling of scholarly artifacts and their usage , 2007, JCDL '07.

[17]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[18]  Georgios C. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Usage derived recommendations for a video digital library , 2007, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[20]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[21]  Josephine Griffith,et al.  A Constrained Spreading Activation Approach to Collaborative Filtering , 2006, KES.

[22]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[23]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Policy-Based Access Control for an RDF Store , 2005, IJCAI 2007.