Memories in drosophila heat-box learning.

Learning and memory processes of operant conditioning in the heat-box are analyzed. In a search for conditioning parameters leading to high retention scores, intermittent training is shown to give better results than those of continuous training. Immediate retention tests contain two memory components, a spatial preference for one side of the chamber and a "stay-where-you-are-effect." Intermittent training strengthens the latter. In the second part, memory dynamics is investigated. Flies are trained in one chamber and tested in a second one after a brief reminder training. With this direct transfer, memory scores reflect an associative learning process in the first chamber. To investigate memory retention after extended time periods, indirect transfer experiments are performed. The fly is transferred to a different environment between training and test phases. With this procedure, an aftereffect of the training can still be observed 2 h later. Surprisingly, exposure to the chamber without conditioning also leads to a memory effect in the indirect transfer experiment. This exposure effect reveals a dispositional change that facilitates operant learning during the reminder training. The various memory effects are independent of the mushroom bodies.

[1]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Temporal pattern of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. , 1974 .

[3]  A. Guo,et al.  Memory consolidation in Drosophila operant visual learning. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[4]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Behavioral manipulation of retrieval in a spatial memory task for Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[5]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Drosophila mushroom bodies are dispensable for visual, tactile, and motor learning. , 1998, Learning & memory.

[6]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Associative odor learning in Drosophila abolished by chemical ablation of mushroom bodies. , 1994, Science.

[7]  Li Liu,et al.  Context generalization in Drosophila visual learning requires the mushroom bodies , 1999, Nature.

[8]  C. H. Honzik,et al.  Degrees of hunger, reward and non-reward, and maze learning in rats, and Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats , 1930 .

[9]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Localization of a short-term memory in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[10]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Conditioned visual flight orientation in Drosophila: dependence on age, practice, and diet. , 1996, Learning & memory.

[11]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Tissue-specific expression of a type I adenylyl cyclase rescues the rutabaga mutant memory defect: in search of the engram. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[12]  R. Menzel,et al.  Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  T. Préat,et al.  Genetic dissection of consolidated memory in Drosophila , 1994, Cell.

[14]  R. Wolf,et al.  A new paradigm for operant conditioning of Drosophila melanogaster , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.