Articulatory evidence for functional coupling of speech and non-speech motor tasks

Control of speech production is part of the larger motor control system, and as such can be organized into coordinative structures (or functional synergies) with other motor behaviors, that can then be parameterized as single functional units. The current study explores this phenomenon, expanding previous findings with direct kinematic evidence of speech production. Findings indicate that amplitude of repetitive synchronized speech and manual movements covary systematically across repetitions. In addition, magnitude of the movement of both of these effectors is larger when the participant is instructed to place emphasis on a repetition with one effector, but not the other. Thus, control of speech prosody may modulate a functional synergy that is defined over a wide set of articulatory subcomponents, not just the speech motor system.

[1]  Betty Tuller,et al.  A “Dynamic Pattern” Perspective on the Control and Coordination of Movement , 1983 .

[2]  F. Huddle Coordination , 1966, Open Knowledge Institutions.

[3]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[4]  S. Tasko,et al.  Association of orofacial muscle activity and movement during changes in speech rate and intensity. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[6]  M. Beckman,et al.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Krakow Physiological organization of syllables: a review , 1999 .

[8]  A Smith,et al.  Interactions between speech and finger movements: an exploration on the dynamic pattern perspective. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[10]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[11]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: A real-time MRI examination , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[12]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. , 1993 .

[13]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries , 1998 .

[14]  P. Ladefoged Three areas of experimental phonetics , 1967 .

[15]  G. Hammond,et al.  Mutual interactions between speech and finger movements. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial strengthening as enhancement of laryngeal features: Aerodynamic evidence from Korean , 2000 .

[17]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[19]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[20]  S. Tasko,et al.  Association of orofacial with laryngeal and respiratory motor output during speech , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.