Optimal control of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies on prostate cancer growth

Prostate cancer can be lethal in advanced stages, for which chemotherapy may become the only viable therapeutic option. While there is no clear clinical management strategy fitting all patients, cytotoxic chemotherapy with docetaxel is currently regarded as the gold standard. However, tumors may regain activity after treatment conclusion and become resistant to docetaxel. This situation calls for new delivery strategies and drug compounds enabling an improved therapeutic outcome. Combination of docetaxel with antiangiogenic therapy has been considered a promising strategy. Bevacizumab is the most common antiangiogenic drug, but clinical studies have not revealed a clear benefit from its combination with docetaxel. Here, we capitalize on our prior work on mathematical modeling of prostate cancer growth subjected to combined cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies, and propose an optimal control framework to robustly compute the drug-independent cytotoxic and antiangiogenic effects enabling an optimal therapeutic control of tumor dynamics. We describe the formulation of the optimal control problem, for which we prove the existence of at least a solution and determine the necessary first order optimality conditions. We then present numerical algorithms based on isogeometric analysis to run a preliminary simulation study over a single cycle of combined therapy. Our results suggest that only cytotoxic chemotherapy is required to optimize therapeutic performance and we show that our framework can produce superior solutions to combined therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab. We also illustrate how the optimal drug-naive cytotoxic effects computed in these simulations may be successfully leveraged to guide drug production and delivery strategies by running a nonlinear least-square fit of protocols involving docetaxel and a new design drug.

[1]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Clinically Relevant Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[2]  V. Quaranta,et al.  Integrative mathematical oncology , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  Keisha N. Hardeman,et al.  Quantifying Drug Combination Synergy along Potency and Efficacy Axes. , 2019, Cell systems.

[4]  Guillermo Lorenzo,et al.  Patient-Specific Characterization of Breast Cancer Hemodynamics Using Image-Guided Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  A Validated Multiscale In-Silico Model for Mechano-sensitive Tumour Angiogenesis and Growth , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[7]  Ignasi Colominas,et al.  Capillary networks in tumor angiogenesis: From discrete endothelial cells to phase‐field averaged descriptions via isogeometric analysis , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[8]  M. Fraldi,et al.  Cells competition in tumor growth poroelasticity , 2018 .

[9]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[10]  David A Hormuth,et al.  Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  Rene Bruno,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors , 2008, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Provably unconditionally stable, second-order time-accurate, mixed variational methods for phase-field models , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: a dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[14]  J. Sprekels,et al.  Optimal Control of a Phase Field System Modelling Tumor Growth with Chemotaxis and Singular Potentials , 2019, Applied Mathematics & Optimization.

[15]  J. Verweij,et al.  Docetaxel administration schedule: from fever to tears? A review of randomised studies. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[16]  Marcial García-Rojo,et al.  Non-standard radiotherapy fractionations delay the time to malignant transformation of low-grade gliomas , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Targeting angiogenesis for the treatment of prostate cancer , 2012, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[18]  Jason M. Graham,et al.  A spatial model of tumor-host interaction: application of chemotherapy. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[19]  Angela M. Jarrett,et al.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI , 2019, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Muhammad Imran,et al.  PEGylation: a promising strategy to overcome challenges to cancer-targeted nanomedicines: a review of challenges to clinical transition and promising resolution , 2019, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[21]  Guillermo Lorenzo,et al.  Tissue-scale, personalized modeling and simulation of prostate cancer growth , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  W Blumenfeld,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. , 1993, The American journal of pathology.

[23]  G Powathil,et al.  Mathematical modeling of brain tumors: effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  J. Oden,et al.  Selection and Validation of Predictive Models of Radiation Effects on Tumor Growth Based on Noninvasive Imaging Data. , 2017, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[25]  J. Burke,et al.  Docetaxel and prednisone with or without lenalidomide in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MAINSAIL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[27]  Alexander R A Anderson,et al.  Quantifying the Role of Angiogenesis in Malignant Progression of Gliomas: in Silico Modeling Integrates Imaging and Histology Nih Public Access Author Manuscript Introduction , 2011 .

[28]  G. Hulbert,et al.  A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method , 2000 .

[29]  Tiago Rodrigues,et al.  The Force at the Tip - Modelling Tension and Proliferation in Sprouting Angiogenesis , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[31]  F. Saad,et al.  Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Shuo Wang,et al.  Optimal control of a mathematical model for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity. , 2016, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[33]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  GENERAL DIFFUSE-INTERFACE THEORIES AND AN APPROACH TO PREDICTIVE TUMOR GROWTH MODELING , 2010 .

[34]  A. C. M. Resende,et al.  A HYBRID THREE-SCALE MODEL OF TUMOR GROWTH. , 2018, Mathematical models & methods in applied sciences : M3AS.

[35]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Role of vascular normalization in benefit from metronomic chemotherapy , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Toward Patient-Specific, Biologically Optimized Radiation Therapy Plans for the Treatment of Glioblastoma , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  David A Hormuth,et al.  Incorporating drug delivery into an imaging-driven, mechanics-coupled reaction diffusion model for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: theory and preliminary clinical results , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Hao-qing Wu,et al.  Long-Time Dynamics and Optimal Control of a Diffuse Interface Model for Tumor Growth , 2019, Applied Mathematics & Optimization.

[39]  Anyue Yin,et al.  A Review of Mathematical Models for Tumor Dynamics and Treatment Resistance Evolution of Solid Tumors , 2019, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[40]  P. Maini,et al.  Modelling aspects of cancer dynamics: a review , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  J. Hainsworth Practical aspects of weekly docetaxel administration schedules. , 2004, The oncologist.

[42]  R W Veltri,et al.  Implication of cell kinetic changes during the progression of human prostatic cancer. , 1995, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[43]  R. Jain Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[44]  E. Small,et al.  A phase 2 study of estramustine, docetaxel, and bevacizumab in men with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer , 2011, Cancer.

[45]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  The experience with cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2012, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[46]  Philip Hahnfeldt,et al.  Maximum tolerated dose versus metronomic scheduling in the treatment of metastatic cancers. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  Andreas Reichel,et al.  Development and Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic‐Modeling Tools to Support Drug Discovery , 2005, Chemistry & biodiversity.

[48]  Hector Gomez,et al.  A Mathematical Model Coupling Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis , 2016, PloS one.

[49]  J. Lions,et al.  Équations Différentielles Opérationnelles Et Problèmes Aux Limites , 1961 .

[50]  D. M. Robinson,et al.  Bevacizumab : A Review of its Use in Advanced Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, and NSCLC (Adis Drug Evaluation) , 2006 .

[51]  P Schucht,et al.  A mathematical model of low grade gliomas treated with temozolomide and its therapeutical implications. , 2017, Mathematical biosciences.

[52]  Pekka Neittaanmki,et al.  Optimal Control from Theory to Computer Programs , 2003 .

[53]  Angela M. Jarrett,et al.  Optimal Control Theory for Personalized Therapeutic Regimens in Oncology: Background, History, Challenges, and Opportunities , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[54]  I. Tannock,et al.  Chemotherapy-based treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  E. Small,et al.  Independent association of angiogenesis index with outcome in prostate cancer. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[56]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using a Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model. , 2015, Cancer research.

[57]  H. Schättler,et al.  Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics , 2019, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B.

[58]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  On the foundations of cancer modelling: Selected topics, speculations, and perspectives , 2008 .

[59]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  AntiAngiogenic Therapy in Cancer Treatment as an Optimal Control Problem , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[60]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  G. Marinoschi,et al.  Sliding Mode Control for a Phase Field System Related to Tumor Growth , 2017, Applied Mathematics & Optimization.

[62]  T. Stamey,et al.  Observations on the doubling time of prostate cancer. The use of serial prostate‐specific antigen in patients with untreated disease as a measure of increasing cancer volume , 1993, Cancer.

[63]  M Kardar,et al.  Dynamics of tumor growth and combination of anti-angiogenic and cytotoxic therapies , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[64]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[65]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Weekly and Every-Three-Weeks Docetaxel , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[66]  T E Yankeelov,et al.  Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth. , 2016, Mathematical models & methods in applied sciences : M3AS.

[67]  Bernhard A Schrefler,et al.  An approach for vascular tumor growth based on a hybrid embedded/homogenized treatment of the vasculature within a multiphase porous medium model , 2019, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[68]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Minimizing long-term tumor burden: the logic for metronomic chemotherapeutic dosing and its antiangiogenic basis. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[69]  Robert A Gatenby,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics modulate time to recurrence in continuous and adaptive cancer therapies , 2017, bioRxiv.

[70]  H. Garcke,et al.  Optimal Control of Treatment Time in a Diffuse Interface Model of Tumor Growth , 2016, 1608.00488.

[71]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth-II: Tumor invasion and angiogenesis. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[72]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Docetaxel for treatment of solid tumours: a systematic review of clinical data. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[73]  Stacey A. Kenfield,et al.  Prospective study of prostate tumor angiogenesis and cancer-specific mortality in the health professionals follow-up study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  Ignasi Colominas,et al.  Computational Modeling of Tumor-Induced Angiogenesis , 2017, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[75]  M. Moyad Docetaxel and Prednisone with or without Lenalidomide in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer ( MAINSAIL ) : A Randomised , Double-Blind , Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial , 2015 .

[76]  J. Sprekels,et al.  Optimal distributed control of a diffuse interface model of tumor growth , 2016, 1601.04567.

[77]  Pierluigi Colli,et al.  Mathematical analysis and simulation study of a phase-field model of prostate cancer growth with chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy effects , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[78]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[79]  John Carl Panetta,et al.  Optimal Control Applied to Competing Chemotherapeutic Cell-Kill Strategies , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[80]  J. Lions Quelques méthodes de résolution de problèmes aux limites non linéaires , 1969 .

[81]  D. Mukherji,et al.  Angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in prostate cancer. , 2013, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[82]  R. Huddart,et al.  Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Tasquinimod in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[83]  E. Small,et al.  A Phase II Trial of Humanized Anti‐Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody for the Treatment of Androgen‐Independent Prostate Cancer , 2001 .

[84]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Suitably graded THB-spline refinement and coarsening: Towards an adaptive isogeometric analysis of additive manufacturing processes , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[85]  G. Sledge,et al.  Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with advanced cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[86]  Bevacizumab , 2019, Reactions Weekly.

[87]  Franziska Michor,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Profiles Determine Optimal Combination Treatment Schedules in Computational Models of Drug Resistance , 2020, Cancer Research.

[88]  W. Oh,et al.  Bevacizumab treatment of prostate cancer , 2012, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[89]  H M Byrne,et al.  A mathematical model to study the effects of drug resistance and vasculature on the response of solid tumors to chemotherapy. , 2000, Mathematical biosciences.

[90]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[91]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[92]  J. Verweij,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile of docetaxel in the elderly. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[93]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial comparing docetaxel and prednisone with or without bevacizumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CALGB 90401. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[94]  Thierry Gil,et al.  Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VENICE): a phase 3, double-blind randomised trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[95]  Ernesto A. B. F. Lima,et al.  A hybrid ten-species phase-field model of tumor growth , 2014 .

[96]  Amy Brock,et al.  A hybrid model of tumor growth and angiogenesis: In silico experiments , 2020, PloS one.

[97]  R. Iyengar,et al.  Merging Systems Biology with Pharmacodynamics , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[98]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Hierarchically refined and coarsened splines for moving interface problems, with particular application to phase-field models of prostate tumor growth , 2017 .

[99]  I. Tannock,et al.  Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[100]  Zvia Agur,et al.  Efficacy of weekly docetaxel and bevacizumab in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: a new theranostic method combining xenografted biopsies with a mathematical model. , 2008, Cancer research.