Determinants of fluidlike behavior and effective viscosity in cross-linked actin networks.

The actin cortex has a well-documented ability to rapidly remodel and flow while maintaining long-range connectivity, but how this is achieved remains poorly understood. Here, we use computer simulations to explore how stress relaxation in cross-linked actin networks subjected to extensional stress depends on the interplay between network architecture and turnover. We characterize a regime in which a network response is nonaffine and stress relaxation is governed by the continuous dissipation of elastic energy via cyclic formation, elongation, and turnover of tension-bearing elements. Within this regime, for a wide range of network parameters, we observe a constant deformation (creep) rate that is linearly proportional to the rate of filament turnover, leading to a constant effective viscosity that is inversely proportional to turnover rate. Significantly, we observe a biphasic dependence of the creep rate on applied stress: below a critical stress threshold, the creep rate increases linearly with applied stress; above that threshold, the creep rate becomes independent of applied stress. We show that this biphasic stress dependence can be understood in terms of the nonlinear force-extension behavior of individual force-transmitting network elements. These results have important implications for understanding the origins and control of viscous flows both in the cortex of living cells and in other polymer networks.

[1]  Lior Haviv,et al.  A cytoskeletal demolition worker: myosin II acts as an actin depolymerization agent. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  S. Ono Mechanism of depolymerization and severing of actin filaments and its significance in cytoskeletal dynamics. , 2007, International review of cytology.

[3]  G. Charras,et al.  Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells , 1991, Nature.

[5]  W. Goldmann,et al.  Viscoelasticity of actin-gelsolin networks in the presence of filamin. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  David A Weitz,et al.  Chapter 19: Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[7]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  H. Kueh,et al.  Actin disassembly by cofilin, coronin, and Aip1 occurs in bursts and is inhibited by barbed-end cappers , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Pierre-François Lenne,et al.  Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[11]  J. White,et al.  Cortical flow in animal cells. , 1988, Science.

[12]  W. Briels,et al.  Inhomogeneous suspensions of rigid rods in flow , 2003 .

[13]  J. Priess,et al.  Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[14]  R. Clift,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles , 1978 .

[15]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[16]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Dynamic role of cross-linking proteins in actin rheology. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[17]  M. Gardel,et al.  Shear thickening of F-actin networks crosslinked with non-muscle myosin IIB. , 2011, Soft matter.

[18]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  Single-Molecule Speckle Analysis of Actin Filament Turnover in Lamellipodia , 2002, Science.

[19]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[20]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology probes length scale dependent rheology. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[21]  David C. Morse,et al.  VISCOELASTICITY OF TIGHTLY ENTANGLED SOLUTIONS OF SEMIFLEXIBLE POLYMERS , 1998 .

[22]  A. Bausch,et al.  Transient binding and dissipation in cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[23]  David A Weitz,et al.  Cross-link-governed dynamics of biopolymer networks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[24]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  T. Pollard,et al.  Tension modulates actin filament polymerization mediated by formin and profilin , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Ikuko Fujiwara,et al.  Polymerization kinetics of ADP- and ADP-Pi-actin determined by fluorescence microscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  P. Wadsworth,et al.  Myosin-II-Dependent Localization and Dynamics of F-Actin during Cytokinesis , 2005, Current Biology.

[29]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  U. Aebi,et al.  Bundling of actin filaments by alpha-actinin depends on its molecular length , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  H. Isambert,et al.  Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation of cross-linked semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[34]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Cortical Actin Turnover during Cytokinesis Requires Myosin II , 2005, Current Biology.