Estimation of Direct Causal Effects

Many common problems in epidemiologic and clinical research involve estimating the effect of an exposure on an outcome while blocking the exposure's effect on an intermediate variable. Effects of this kind are termed direct effects. Estimation of direct effects is typically the goal of research aimed at understanding mechanistic pathways by which an exposure acts to cause or prevent disease, as well as in many other settings. Although multivariable regression is commonly used to estimate direct effects, this approach requires assumptions beyond those required for the estimation of total causal effects. In addition, when the exposure and intermediate variables interact to cause disease, multivariable regression estimates a particular type of direct effect—the effect of an exposure on an outcome when the intermediate is fixed at a specified level. Using the counterfactual framework, we distinguish this definition of a direct effect (controlled direct effect) from an alternative definition, in which the effect of the exposure on the intermediate is blocked, but the intermediate is otherwise allowed to vary as it would in the absence of exposure (natural direct effect). We illustrate the difference between controlled and natural direct effects using several examples. We present an estimation approach for natural direct effects that can be implemented using standard statistical software, and we review the assumptions underlying our approach (which are less restrictive than those proposed by previous authors).

[1]  A. Badley,et al.  Decreased HIV-associated T cell apoptosis by HIV protease inhibitors. , 2000, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[2]  Adeeba Kamarulzaman,et al.  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses , 2006 .

[3]  J Schwartz,et al.  Air pollution and hospital admissions for heart disease in eight U.S. counties. , 1998, Epidemiology.

[4]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[5]  Maya L. Petersen,et al.  Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies , 2004 .

[6]  Richard F MacLehose,et al.  Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Cole,et al.  Fallibility in estimating direct effects. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Karuppiah Muthumani,et al.  Mechanism of HIV-1 viral protein R-induced apoptosis. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  R Hoh,et al.  Virologic and immunologic consequences of discontinuing combination antiretroviral-drug therapy in HIV-infected patients with detectable viremia. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Nicholas Rose,et al.  Highly Structured Stochastic Systems , 2005, Technometrics.

[11]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[12]  G A Colditz,et al.  Restriction as a method for reducing bias in the estimation of direct effects. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[14]  Matti Välimäki,et al.  Effects of hormone therapy and alendronate on C-reactive protein, E-selectin, and sex hormone-binding globulin in osteoporotic women. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  R. Grant,et al.  Sustained CD4+ T cell response after virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[17]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[18]  D. Rubin Direct and Indirect Causal Effects via Potential Outcomes * , 2004 .

[19]  Peter Green,et al.  Highly Structured Stochastic Systems , 2003 .

[20]  J. Martinez-Picado,et al.  Replicative Fitness of Protease Inhibitor-Resistant Mutants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 , 1999, Journal of Virology.