Assessment of the Portuguese building thermal code: Newly revised requirements for cooling energy ne

In this paper, cooling energy needs are calculated by the steady-state methodology of the Portuguese building thermal code. After the first period of building code implementation, re-evaluation according to EN ISO 13790 is recommended in order to compare results with the dynamic simulation results. From these analyses, a newly revised methodology arises including a few corrections in procedure. This iterative result is sufficiently accurate to calculate the building’s cooling energy needs. Secondly, results show that the required conditions are insufficient to prevent overheating. The use of the gain utilization factor as an overheating risk index is suggested, according to an adaptive comfort protocol, and is integrated in the method used to calculate the maximum value for cooling energy needs. This proposed streamlined method depends on reference values: window-to-floor area ratio, window shading g-value, integrated solar radiation and gain utilization factor, which leads to threshold values significantly below the ones currently used. These revised requirements are more restrictive and, therefore, will act to improve a building’s thermal performance during summer. As a rule of thumb applied for Portuguese climates, the reference gain utilization factor should assume a minimum value of 0.8 for a latitude angle range of 40–41°N, 0.6 for 38–39°N and 0.5 for 37°N.

[1]  Servando Álvarez Domínguez,et al.  Revision of the Trombe wall calculation method proposed by UNE-EN ISO 13790 , 2010 .

[2]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[3]  J. Kurnitski,et al.  Performance of EN ISO 13790 utilisation factor heat demand calculation method in a cold climate , 2007 .

[4]  H. van Dijk,et al.  A MONTHLY METHOD FOR CALCULATING ENERGY PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN BUILDING REGULATIONS , 2005 .

[5]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Understanding the adaptive approach to thermal comfort , 1998 .

[6]  Siaw Kiang Chou,et al.  Energy performance of residential buildings in Singapore , 2010 .

[7]  Abd El-Aziz S. Fouda,et al.  Assessment of a modified method for determining the cooling load of residential buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Vítor Leal,et al.  378: Relating Energy Indicators of Regulations to Passive Comfort in Residential Buildings , 2008 .

[9]  Daniel E. Fisher,et al.  ENERGYPLUS: AN UPDATE , 2004 .

[10]  Manuela Guedes de Almeida,et al.  The calculation model of the new Portuguese thermal regulation : put side by side with dynamic simulation , 2007 .

[11]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Residential building envelope heat gain and cooling energy requirements , 2005 .

[12]  Sandra Monteiro Silva,et al.  Accuracy of the Portuguese EPBD implemented thermal performance calculation procedures: RCCTE , 2009 .

[13]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Assessment of building cooling energy need through a quasi-steady state model : Simplified correlation for gain-loss mismatch , 2007 .

[14]  Amaryllis Audenaert,et al.  Economic analysis of the profitability of energy-saving architectural measures for the achievement of the EPB-standard , 2010 .

[15]  F. Nicol,et al.  Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251 , 2010 .

[16]  Francis W.H. Yik,et al.  An evaluation of the appropriateness of using overall thermal transfer value (OTTV) to regulate envelope energy performance of air-conditioned buildings , 2004 .

[17]  Charles Yousif,et al.  Energy performance of residential buildings in Malta , 2010 .