Calibration of Highway Safety Manual Work Zone Crash Modification Factors

The Highway Safety Manual is the national safety manual that provides quantitative methods for analyzing highway safety. The HSM presents crash modification factors related to work zone characteristics such as work zone duration and length. These crash modification factors were based on high-impact work zones in California. Therefore there was a need to use work zone and safety data from the Midwest to calibrate these crash modification factors for use in the Midwest. Almost 11,000 Missouri freeway work zones were analyzed to derive a representative and stratified sample of 162 work zones. The 162 work zones was more than four times the number of work zones used in the HSM. This dataset was used for modeling and testing crash modification factors applicable to the Midwest. The dataset contained work zones ranging from 0.76 mile to 9.24 miles and with durations from 16 days to 590 days. A combined fatal/injury/non-injury model produced a R2 fit of 0.9079 and a prediction slope of 0.963. The resulting crash modification factors of 1.01 for duration and 0.58 for length were smaller than the values in the HSM. Two practical application examples illustrate the use of the crash modification factors for comparing alternate work zone setups.

[1]  黒田 孝次,et al.  Highway Capacity Manual改訂の動向--テイラ-教授の講演より , 1984 .

[2]  N. Ismail,et al.  Handling Overdispersion with Negative Binomial and Generalized Poisson Regression Models , 2007 .

[3]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[4]  A. Tarko,et al.  Safety Models for Rural Freeway Work Zones , 2000 .

[5]  Praveen K. Edara Evaluation of Work Zone Enhancement Software Programs , 2009 .

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[7]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  Analysis of Crash Rates at Interstate Work Zones in Indiana , 1996 .

[8]  Erdong Chen,et al.  Modeling safety of highway work zones with random parameters and random effects models , 2014 .

[9]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[10]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Developing Accident Modification Functions , 2009 .

[11]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Use of Empirical Bayesian Methods to Estimate Crash Modification Factors for Daytime versus Nighttime Work Zones , 2011 .

[12]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Frank Gross,et al.  A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors , 2010 .

[14]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Work Zone Safety Analysis and Modeling: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[15]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Frequency of Work Zone Accidents on Construction Projects , 2005 .

[16]  Neil Salkind Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics , 2006 .

[17]  Karen Dixon,et al.  Recommended Protocols for Developing Crash Modification Factors , 2012 .

[18]  Hong Yang,et al.  Crash Frequency Modeling for Highway Construction Zones , 2013 .

[19]  A. Khattak,et al.  Effects of work zone presence on injury and non-injury crashes. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.