Complex adaptive systems approach to sewol ferry disaster in Korea

This paper aims to introduce the concept and characteristics of natech disaster (natural hazards triggered technological disaster) and to explore the policy issues in complex disaster management in Korea. This research examines the issues of natech complex disaster through analysis of Sewol ferry disaster. Various variables of developing the risk communication are derived using bow-tie model, and the detailed causes are derived using ABM (Agent -based model). Therefore, this study is to apply the catastrophe based approach for improving effective holistic approaches to disaster and to investigate the changing factor analysis of the risk communication with dynamic characteristics using the model of complex adaptive systems. Based on the results of analyzes, this research concludes with a few policy suggestions.First, the natech complex disaster management needs to be approached in complex adaptive perspective. Second, by psychological, social network analysis, and linking reaction after the disaster, we could cope with the physical disaster similar in the future. Thus, the concepts of hazard and vulnerability cannot be defined independently of one another. Third, the perception of vulnerability as a “psychological event” implies that disaster has a point of beginning and an end. Therefore, determines vulnerability management actions as prevention or mitigation (before), emergency response (during) and long-term rehabilitation and development (after), which together form part of the vulnerability management cycle.In conclusion, complex adaptive systems approach to the vulnerability could cause us to change our focus on preparing for the impact of events, and perhaps it should induce us to widen our horizon concerning the dynamics and implications of the natech disaster.

[1]  T. Horlick-Jones,et al.  Modern Disasters as Outrage and Betrayal , 1995, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[2]  Burton Al The environment as hazard , 1978 .

[3]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[4]  J. Yun How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation , 2015 .

[5]  M. Duffield The symphony of the damned: racial discourse, complex political emergencies and humanitarian aid. , 1996, Disasters.

[6]  D. McEntire Triggering agents, vulnerabilities and disaster reduction: towards a holistic paradigm , 2001 .

[7]  Phil O'Keefe,et al.  On The Emergence of Complex Disasters , 1997 .

[8]  T. Drabek Human system responses to disaster , 1986 .

[9]  R. Krueger,et al.  Toward scientifically useful quantitative models of psychopathology: The importance of a comparative approach , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena , 2013 .

[11]  J. Goltz,et al.  Are the News Media Responsible for the Disaster Myths? A Content Analysis of Emergency Response Imagery , 1984, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[12]  David Alexander,et al.  Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters , 2000 .

[13]  D Borsboom,et al.  The pathoplasticity of dysphoric episodes: differential impact of stressful life events on the pattern of depressive symptom inter-correlations , 2011, Psychological Medicine.

[14]  S. K. Patra,et al.  Globalization of R&D and open innovation: linkages of foreign R&D centers in India , 2015 .

[15]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Green governance and green clusters: regional & national policies for the climate change challenge of Central & Eastern Europe , 2015 .

[16]  Adam S. Markowski,et al.  “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis , 2011 .

[17]  F. Bell Geological Hazards: Their Assessment, Avoidance and Mitigation , 1999 .

[18]  René Thom,et al.  Structural stability and morphogenesis - an outline of a general theory of models , 1977, Advanced book classics.

[19]  Junghee Han,et al.  Platform business Eco-model evolution: case study on KakaoTalk in Korea , 2015 .

[20]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. , 2008, Journal of clinical psychology.

[21]  Anthony Oliver-Smith,et al.  Global changes and the definition of disaster , 2005 .

[22]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[23]  Joon-ho Kim,et al.  Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers , 2015 .

[24]  B. Kennedy A Naughty World , 1979 .

[25]  P Ploughman,et al.  The American print news media 'construction' of five natural disasters. , 1995, Disasters.

[26]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  David Alexander,et al.  A survey of the field of natural hazards and disaster studies , 1995 .

[28]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards , 2010 .

[29]  Risa Palm Urban earthquake hazards , 1998 .

[30]  A. M. Cruz,et al.  Analysis of Natech (Natural Hazard Triggering Technological Disasters) Disaster Management , 2004 .