Expert Failure: Re-evaluating Research Assessment

It is unlikely that there is any single objective measure of merit, so research assessment therefore requires new multivariate metrics that reflect the context of research, regardless of discipline.

[1]  Björn Brembs,et al.  Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Emma Hill,et al.  Irreproducible Results—a Response to Thomson Scientific , 2008, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  Roberta Kwok,et al.  Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark , 2013, Nature.

[4]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations , 2013, PLoS biology.

[5]  Martin Fenner,et al.  Altmetrics in Evolution: Defining and Redefining the Ontology of Article-Level Metrics , 2013 .

[6]  Stacy Konkiel,et al.  New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics , 2013 .

[7]  Emma Hill,et al.  Show me the data. , 1998 .

[8]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Altmetrics: Value all research products , 2013, Nature.

[9]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Jason Priem.  Scholarship: Beyond the paper , 2013, Nature.

[11]  Robin Chin Roemer,et al.  Institutional Altmetrics and Academic Libraries , 2013 .

[12]  Mike Taylor,et al.  Exploring the Boundaries: How Altmetrics Can Expand Our Vision of Scholarly Communication and Social Impact , 2013 .

[13]  M. Walport,et al.  Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  Richard Smith,et al.  Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  F. Galligan,et al.  Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure , 2013 .

[16]  C. Neylon,et al.  Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact , 2009, PLoS biology.

[17]  The Impact Factor Game , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[18]  M. Hochberg.  Good science depends on good peer review , 2014 .