Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.

[1]  M E Eldeeb,et al.  The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. , 1985, International endodontic journal.

[2]  P M Dummer,et al.  A comparison of the ability of K-files and Hedstrom files to shape simulated root canals in resin blocks. , 1989, International endodontic journal.

[3]  P M Dummer,et al.  A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[4]  Paul Michael Howell Dummer,et al.  Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 1 , 1992 .

[5]  P. Esposito,et al.  A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  S A Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[8]  S A Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[9]  P. Dummer,et al.  Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[10]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[11]  E. Schäfer,et al.  A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  E Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[13]  O. Peters,et al.  Root canal preparation with FlexMaster: asessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[14]  R. Weiger,et al.  Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[15]  M. Hülsmann,et al.  A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[16]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[17]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[18]  M Hülsmann,et al.  Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[19]  E Schäfer,et al.  Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[20]  P. Dummer,et al.  Shaping ability of RaCe rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.