Molecular Profiling of Exceptional Responders to Cancer Therapy.

BACKGROUND The vast majority of metastatic cancers cannot be cured. Palliative treatment may relieve disease symptoms by stopping or slowing cancer growth and may prolong patients' lives, but almost all patients will inevitably develop disease progression after initial response. However, for reasons that are not fully understood, a very few patients will have extraordinary durable responses to standard anticancer treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed exceptional responders treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center between September 2009 and November 2017. An exceptional response was defined as a complete response lasting more than 1 year or a partial response and/or stable disease for more than 2 years. Tumor samples were analyzed using an Ambry Genetics test kit with a 142-gene panel. Messenger RNA expression was evaluated using NanoString's nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel and Immune Profiling Panel and compared with matched controls for gender, age, and cancer type. RESULTS Twenty-six exceptional responders with metastatic bladder, kidney, breast, lung, ovarian, uterine, and colon cancers were enrolled. Mutations were identified in 45 genes. The most common mutation was an EPHA5 nonsynonymous mutation detected in 87.5% of patients. Mutations in DNA damage repair pathway genes were also frequent, suggesting increased genome instability. We also found varying expression of 73 genes in the Pathways panel and 85 genes in the Immune Profiling panel, many of them responsible for improvement in tumor recognition and antitumor immune response. CONCLUSIONS The genomic instability detected in our exceptional responders, plus treatment with DNA damage compounds combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses to standard anticancer therapies in the patients studied. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE With recent advances in the treatment of cancer, there is increased emphasis on the importance of identifying molecular markers to predict treatment response and outcomes, thereby allowing precision oncology. In this study, we hypothesized that there is a "specific biologic signature" in the biology of the cancer in long-term survivors that allows sensitivity to systemic therapy and durability of response. We found that DNA damage repair pathway alterations, combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses to standard anticancer therapies in exceptional responders analyzed in this single-center retrospective study. It is very likely that an in-depth examination of outlier responses will become a standard component of drug development in the future.

[1]  C. Weight Sunitinib Versus Interferon Alfa in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2021 .

[2]  Yuchen Liu,et al.  EPHA5 mutation predicts the durable clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lung adenocarcinoma , 2020, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[3]  Yi Zhang,et al.  EPHA5 mutation impairs natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity against non-small lung cancer cells and promotes cancer cell migration and invasion. , 2020, Molecular and cellular probes.

[4]  D. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy by Abrogating the TopBP1/ATR-Mediated DNA Damage Response , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  T. Powles,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Motzer,et al.  Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Herbst,et al.  Should chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibition be the standard front‐line therapy for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer? , 2018, Cancer.

[8]  P. Mehlen,et al.  Notch Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[9]  T. Golde,et al.  Notch Signaling in Myeloid Cells as a Regulator of Tumor Immune Responses , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[10]  Yan Cai,et al.  miR-215 promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and proliferation by regulating LEFTY2 in endometrial cancer , 2018, International journal of molecular medicine.

[11]  F. Kühnel,et al.  CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth , 2017, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[12]  M. Saegusa,et al.  Identification of LEFTY as a molecular marker for ovarian clear cell carcinoma , 2017, Oncotarget.

[13]  S. Pillai,et al.  Viewing Siglecs through the lens of tumor immunology , 2017, Immunological reviews.

[14]  L. Miller,et al.  Conservation of immune gene signatures in solid tumors and prognostic implications , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[15]  V. Gorgoulis,et al.  DNA Damage Response and Autophagy: A Meaningful Partnership , 2016, Front. Genet..

[16]  E. Shiuan,et al.  Eph Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Tumor Immunity. , 2016, Cancer research.

[17]  E. Plimack,et al.  TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy , 2016, Oncotarget.

[18]  P. Lian,et al.  Gas1 Inhibits Metastatic and Metabolic Phenotypes in Colorectal Carcinoma , 2016, Molecular Cancer Research.

[19]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  dbNSFP v3.0: A One‐Stop Database of Functional Predictions and Annotations for Human Nonsynonymous and Splice‐Site SNVs , 2016, Human mutation.

[20]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Improved Treatment of Breast Cancer with Anti-HER2 Therapy Requires Interleukin-21 Signaling in CD8+ T Cells. , 2016, Cancer research.

[21]  N. Habermann,et al.  Genetic variants in DNA repair genes as potential predictive markers for oxaliplatin chemotherapy in colorectal cancer , 2015, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[22]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Mcnamara,et al.  OX40 Agonists and Combination Immunotherapy: Putting the Pedal to the Metal , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[24]  Diane D. Liu,et al.  Receptor Tyrosine Kinase EphA5 Is a Functional Molecular Target in Human Lung Cancer , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  K. Midwood,et al.  Tenascin-C: Exploitation and collateral damage in cancer management , 2015, Cell adhesion & migration.

[26]  T. Stankovic,et al.  The impact of SF3B1 mutations in CLL on the DNA-damage response , 2014, Leukemia.

[27]  B. Fox,et al.  OX40 is a potent immune-stimulating target in late-stage cancer patients. , 2013, Cancer research.

[28]  Peter Bouwman,et al.  The effects of deregulated DNA damage signalling on cancer chemotherapy response and resistance , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[29]  B. Leggett,et al.  Thrombospondin-4 is a putative tumour-suppressor gene in colorectal cancer that exhibits age-related methylation , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[30]  H. Hakonarson,et al.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[32]  R. Figlin,et al.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  M. Gilliet,et al.  OX40 ligand shuts down IL-10-producing regulatory T cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Delabie,et al.  Ephrin-A1 binding to CD4+ T lymphocytes stimulates migration and induces tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2. , 2005, Blood.

[35]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  J. Finke,et al.  Disease stage variation in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell reactivity to the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma. , 2003, Cancer research.

[37]  M. Kudo,et al.  Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score) , 2003, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[38]  A. Weinberg,et al.  Induction of Anti-Mammary Cancer Immunity by Engaging the OX-40 Receptor in Vivo , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[39]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Clinical and molecular characterization of a rare syndrome of acute promyelocytic leukemia associated with translocation (11;17). , 1995, Blood.

[40]  Yousef Ahmed Fouad,et al.  Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. , 2017, American journal of cancer research.

[41]  Lisa McShane,et al.  National Cancer Institute's Precision Medicine Initiatives for the new National Clinical Trials Network. , 2014, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[42]  Yun Zheng,et al.  Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiling reveals candidate genes associated with cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, Epigenetics.

[43]  J. Reeves,et al.  Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Clinical and Molecular Characterization of a Rare Syndrome of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Associated With Translocation , 2002 .

[45]  G. Burkland,et al.  Case report: rapid and complete control of idiopathic hypereosinophilia with imatinib mesylate. , 2001, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[46]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .