Protective measurements of the wave function of a single system

My view on the meaning of the quantum wave function and its connection to protective measurements is described. The wave function and only the wave function is the ontology of the quantum theory. Protective measurements support this view although they do not provide a decisive proof. A brief review of the discovery and the criticism of protective measurement is presented. Protective measurements with postselection are discussed. Introduction In the first graduate course of quantum mechanics I remember asking the question: “Can we consider the wave function as a description of a single quantum system?” I got no answer. Twelve years later, in South Carolina, after I completed my Ph.D. studies at Tel Aviv University under the supervision of Yakir Aharonov in which we developed the theory of weak measurements [1], I asked Aharonov: Can we use weak measurement to observe the wave function of a single particle? At that time I had already become a strong believer in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics [2] and had no doubt that a single system is described by the wave function. Yakir Aharonov never shared with me the belief in the MWI. When we realized that using what is called now protective measurement , we can, under certain conditions, observe the wave function of a single quantum system, he was really excited by the result. At 1992 I was invited to a conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Japan where I presented this result: “The Schrodinger wave is observable after all!”[3]. Then I went home to Tel Aviv where I finished writing a letter which received mixed reviews in Phys. Rev. Lett. , while Jeeva Anandan, working on the topic with Aharonov in South Carolina, wrote a paper accepted in Phys. Rev. A [4]. After acceptance of the PRA paper it was hard to fight the referees in PRL, but PLA accepted it immediately [5].

[1]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Complete description of a quantum system at a given time , 1991 .

[2]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance , 1997 .

[3]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  ABOUT POSITION MEASUREMENTS WHICH DO NOT SHOW THE BOHMIAN PARTICLE POSITION , 1996 .

[4]  Extracting joint weak values with local, single-particle measurements. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[5]  Jos Uffink How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements , 1999 .

[6]  Hajime Ezawa,et al.  Quantum Control and Measurement , 1993 .

[7]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  ARE QUANTUM STATES REAL , 2012, 1205.1439.

[8]  N. D. Hari Dass,et al.  Critique of protective measurements , 1999 .

[9]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[10]  Partha Ghose,et al.  An analysis of the Aharonov-Anandan-Vaidman model , 1995 .

[11]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[12]  Nonlocal aspects of a quantum wave , 1999, quant-ph/9909072.

[13]  L. Vaidman Weak-measurement elements of reality , 1996 .

[14]  Jos Uffink,et al.  Reply to Gao's “On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements” , 2013 .

[15]  Shan Gao The meaning of the wave function , 2010 .

[16]  Vaidman Nonlocality of a Single Photon Revisited Again. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[17]  Measurements of non local weak values , 2009, 0902.4251.

[18]  Yuen,et al.  Impossibility of measuring the wave function of a single quantum system. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[19]  M. Berry,et al.  Five momenta , 2013 .

[20]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Protective Measurements of Two-State Vectors , 1997 .

[21]  Stephen Gamboa‐Eastman The Collapse of the Wave Function , 1996 .

[22]  Yakir AharonovandLev Vaidman Measurement of the Schrodingerwaveof a single particle , 1993 .

[23]  Renato Renner,et al.  Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[24]  G. S. Paraoanu Extraction of information from a single quantum , 2011 .

[25]  Michael Dickson,et al.  An Empirical Reply to Empiricism: Protective Measurement Opens the Door for Quantum Realism , 1995, Philosophy of Science.

[26]  Shan Gao,et al.  On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements , 2013 .

[27]  Vaidman,et al.  Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[28]  S. Nussinov Realistic experiments for measuring the wave function of a single particle , 1996 .

[29]  Vaidman,et al.  Meaning of the wave function. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[30]  Alain Aspect,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Beables for quantum field theory , 2004 .

[31]  M. Vrakking,et al.  Wave function microscopy of quasibound atomic states. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[32]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  The Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015 .

[33]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: an appraisal , 1996 .

[34]  Berthold-Georg Englert,et al.  Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories , 1992 .

[35]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction , 2011, Nature.

[36]  Protective measurement of the wave function of a single squeezed harmonic-oscillator state. , 1996 .

[37]  A. Kent,et al.  Many worlds? : Everett, quantum theory, and reality , 2010 .

[38]  Vaidman,et al.  Causality constraints on nonlocal quantum measurements. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[39]  Unruh Reality and measurement of the wave function. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[40]  Yamamoto,et al.  Protective measurement of the wave function of a single squeezed harmonic-oscillator state. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[41]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2009, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[42]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  The meaning of protective measurements , 1994 .

[43]  Vaidman,et al.  Measurement process in relativistic quantum theory. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[44]  L. Vaidman Time Symmetry and the Many-Worlds Interpretation , 2009 .

[45]  Berthold-Georg Englert,et al.  PROTECTIVE MEASUREMENTS AND BOHM TRAJECTORIES , 1999 .