Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer

A Laplace transform solution is presented for the problem of flow to a partially penetrating well of finite diameter in a slightly compressible water table aquifer. The solution, which allows for evaluation of both pumped well and observation piezometer data, accounts for effects of well bore storage and skin and allows for the noninstantaneous release of water from the unsaturated zone. For instantaneous release of water from the unsaturated zone the solution approaches the line source solution derived by Neuman as the diameter of the pumped well approaches zero. Delayed piezometer response, which is significant during times of rapidly changing hydraulic head, is included in the theoretical treatment and shown to be an important factor in accurate evaluation of specific storage. By means of a hypothetical field example it is demonstrated that evaluations of specific storage (Ss) using classical line source solutions may yield values of Ss that are overestimated by a factor of 100 or more, depending upon the location of the observation piezometers and whether effects of delayed piezometer response are included in the analysis. Theoretical responses obtained with the proposed model are used to suggest methods for evaluating specific storage.

[1]  S. P. Neuman.  Analysis of Pumping Test Data From Anisotropic Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response , 1975 .

[2]  K. Sridharan,et al.  Analysis of flow near a dug well in an unconfined aquifer , 1990 .

[3]  T. Narasimhan,et al.  Transient flow of water to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Applicability of some conceptual models , 1993 .

[4]  H. J. Ramey,et al.  Annulus Unloading Rates as Influenced by Wellbore Storage and Skin Effect , 1972 .

[5]  D. K. Babu,et al.  Flow to a Partially Penetrating Well in a Double‐Porosity Reservoir , 1984 .

[6]  N S Boulton,et al.  ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM NON-EQUILIBRIUM PUMPING TESTS ALLOWING FOR DELAYED YIELD FROM STORAGE. , 1963 .

[7]  C. E. Heywood.  Investigation of aquifer-system compaction in the Hueco basin, El Paso, Texas, USA , 1995 .

[8]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1952 .

[9]  James J. Butler,et al.  Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests , 1996 .

[10]  G. Dagan,et al.  A Method of Determining the Permeability and Effective Porosity of Unconfined Anisotropie Aquifers , 1967 .

[11]  S. P. Neuman.  Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table , 1972 .

[12]  Allen F. Moench.  Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer , 1995 .

[13]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1984 .

[14]  Thomas E. Reilly,et al.  Simulation of cylindrical flow to a well using the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model , 1993 .

[15]  M. S. Hantush.  Hydraulics of Wells , 1964 .

[16]  A. Moench,et al.  Flow to a Well in a Water‐Table Aquifer: An Improved Laplace Transform Solution , 1996 .

[17]  J. F. Poland,et al.  Land subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, California, as of 1980 , 1984 .

[18]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response , 1974 .

[19]  J. Black,et al.  Observation well response time and its effect upon aquifer test results , 1977 .

[20]  J. W. Brown,et al.  Fourier series and boundary value problems , 1941 .

[21]  A. Moench,et al.  Transient Flow to a Large‐Diameter Well in an Aquifer With Storative Semiconfining Layers , 1985 .

[22]  T. D. Streltsova,et al.  The drawdown near an abstraction well of large diameter under non-steady conditions in an unconfined aquifer , 1976 .

[23]  Allen F. Moench,et al.  Specific Yield as Determined by Type‐Curve Analysis of Aquifer‐Test Data , 1994 .

[24]  M. J. Hvorslev.  Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations , 1951 .