THE COMPREHENSIVE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL FOR STENTING: THE INFLUENCE OF STENT DESIGN ON THE OUTCOME AFTER CORONARY STENT PLACEMENT

Stenting is one of the most important methods to treat atherosclerosis. Due to its simplicity and efficiency, the use of coronary stents in interventional procedures has rapidly increased, and different stent designs have been introduced in the market. In order to select the most appropriate stent design, it is necessary to analyze and compare the mechanical behavior of different types of stents. In this paper, the finite element method is used for analyzing the behavior of stents. The aim of this work is to investigate the expansion characteristics of a stent as it is deployed and implanted in an artery containing a plaque and propose a model as close to real conditions of stent implantation as possible. Furthermore, two commercially available stents (the Palmaz-Schatz and Multi-Link stents) are modeled and their behavior during the deployment is compared in terms of stress distribution, radial gain, outer diameter changes and dogboning. Moreover, the effect of stent design on the restenosis rate is investigated by comparing the stress distribution in the arteries. The results show the importance of considering the plaque in finite element simulation of mechanical behavior of the coronary stent. According to the findings, the possibility of restenosis is nonsignificantly lower for the Multi-Link stent in comparison with the Palmaz-Schatz stent, which is in good agreement with clinical results.

[1]  S. Chua,et al.  Finite-element simulation of stent expansion , 2002 .

[2]  Pascal Verdonck,et al.  Finite element analysis and stent design , 2005 .

[3]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  C Dumoulin,et al.  Mechanical behaviour modelling of balloon-expandable stents. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. Baim,et al.  Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Zihui Xia,et al.  A general finite element analysis method for balloon expandable stents based on repeated unit cell (RUC) model , 2007 .

[7]  Caitríona Lally,et al.  The influence of plaque composition on underlying arterial wall stress during stent expansion: the case for lesion-specific stents. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  S. Chua,et al.  Effects of varying slotted tube (stent) geometry on its expansion behaviour using finite element method , 2004 .

[9]  Larry S. Dean,et al.  Randomized Comparison of GR-II Stent and Palmaz-Schatz Stent for Elective Treatment of Coronary Stenoses , 2000, Circulation.

[10]  Weiqiang Wang,et al.  Stent expansion in curved vessel and their interactions: a finite element analysis. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  U. Tebbe,et al.  Randomized comparison of J&J Crown stent versus NIR stent after routine coronary angioplasty. , 2001, American heart journal.

[12]  S. Chua,et al.  Finite element simulation of stent and balloon interaction , 2003 .

[13]  D. Baim,et al.  In vivo assessment of stent expansion and recoil in normal porcine coronary arteries: differential outcome by stent design. , 1999, Circulation.

[14]  Walter Maurel,et al.  Biomechanical Models for Soft Tissue Simulation , 2003, Esprit Basic Research Series.

[15]  Zihui Xia,et al.  On the finite element modelling of balloon-expandable stents. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[16]  S. Chua,et al.  Finite element simulation of slotted tube (stent) with the presence of plaque and artery by balloon expansion , 2004 .

[17]  Patrick W. Serruys,et al.  Handbook of Coronary Stents , 1997 .

[18]  Francesco Migliavacca,et al.  Effects of different stent designs on local hemodynamics in stented arteries. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  C Di Mario,et al.  The bigger, the better: true also for in-stent restenosis? , 2000, European heart journal.

[22]  Lorenza Petrini,et al.  On the effects of different strategies in modelling balloon-expandable stenting by means of finite element method. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  R N Vaishnav,et al.  Compressibility of the Arterial Wall , 1968, Circulation research.

[24]  P. Boekstegers,et al.  Influence of stent design on 1‐year outcome after coronary stent placement: A randomized comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patients , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Linxia Gu,et al.  Finite element analysis of covered microstents. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Peter E. McHugh,et al.  Analysis of the mechanical performance of a cardiovascular stent design based on micromechanical modelling , 2004 .

[27]  Shijia Zhao,et al.  The Relation Between the Arterial Stress and Restenosis Rate After , 2010 .

[28]  Zbigniew Paszenda,et al.  Experimental and numerical biomechanical analysis of vascular stent , 2005 .

[29]  Weiqiang Wang,et al.  Analysis of the transient expansion behavior and design optimization of coronary stents by finite element method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  K Ulm,et al.  Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.