A Sensitivity-Analysis-Based Approach for the Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models

In this paper, a multistep sensitivity analysis (SA) approach for model calibration is proposed and applied to a complex traffic simulation model with more than 100 parameters. Throughout this paper, it is argued that the application of SA is crucial for true comprehension and the correct use of traffic simulation models, but it is also acknowledged that the main obstacle toward an extensive use of the most sophisticated techniques is the high number of model runs usually required. For this reason, we have tested the possibility of performing a multistep SA, where, at each step, model parameters are grouped on the basis of possible common features, and a final SA on the parameters pertaining to the most influential groups is then performed. The proposed methodology was applied to an urban motorway case study simulated using MITSIMLab, a complex microscopic traffic simulator. The method allowed the analysis of the role played by all parameters and by the model stochasticity itself, with 80% fewer model evaluations than the standard variance-based approach. Ten model parameters accounted for a big share in the output variance for the specific case study. A Kriging metamodel was then estimated and integrated with the multistep SA results for a global calibration framework in the presence of uncertainty. Results confirm the great potential of this approach and open up to a novel view for the calibration of a traffic simulation model.

[1]  Li Zhe,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of PARAMICS Based on 2K-P Fractional Factorial Design , 2009 .

[2]  Panos G Michalopoulos,et al.  Methodology for performance optimization of ramp control strategies through microsimulation , 2005 .

[3]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Integrated driving behavior modeling , 2007 .

[4]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  How Parameters of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models Relate to Traffic Dynamics in Simulation , 2009 .

[5]  I. Sobol Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property , 1976 .

[6]  Mathew Kurian Calibration of a microscopic traffic simulator , 2000 .

[7]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[8]  Yan Xu,et al.  Modeling reaction time within a traffic simulation model , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[9]  Anna Schirokoff,et al.  Development of a nanoscopic traffic simulation tool , 2009 .

[10]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[11]  K. Ozbay,et al.  Modeling and simulation of an unconventional traffic circle , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005..

[12]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Simulation Laboratory for Evaluating Dynamic Traffic Management Systems , 1997 .

[13]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[14]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[15]  Tom V. Mathew,et al.  Calibration of Microsimulation Models for Nonlane-Based Heterogeneous Traffic at Signalized Intersections , 2010 .

[16]  Punzo Vincenzo,et al.  From theory to practice: Gaussian process metamodels for the sensitivity analysis of traffic simulation models. A case study of the Aimsun mesoscopic model. , 2013 .

[17]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[18]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[19]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Comparison of Simulation-Based and Model-Based Calibrations of Traffic-Flow Microsimulation Models , 2008 .

[20]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Dynamic Estimators of Origin-Destination Matrices Using Traffic Counts , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[21]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models with Point-to-Point Traffic Surveillance , 2009 .

[22]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Calibrating Car-Following Models by Using Trajectory Data , 2008, 0803.4063.

[23]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Automatic Vehicle Trajectory Extraction by Aerial Remote Sensing , 2014 .

[24]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  “No Free Lunch” Theorems Applied to the Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  K. Ahmed Modeling drivers' acceleration and lane changing behavior , 1999 .

[26]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[27]  Emily D. Sterzin Modeling influencing factors in a microscopic traffic simulator , 2004 .

[28]  Randy Machemehl,et al.  Vissim: A Multi-Parameter Sensitivity Analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[29]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Procedure for the Calibration of Simulation Models , 2005 .

[31]  Ronghui Liu,et al.  The principles of calibrating traffic microsimulation models , 2008 .