The Multispatula; a spatula adjustable to the shape of the individual cervix.

[1]  G. Draper,et al.  Controlled trial of a new cervical spatula. , 1987, British medical journal.

[2]  C. Kivlahan,et al.  Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate? , 1986, Acta cytologica.

[3]  Boon Me,et al.  Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates. , 1986 .

[4]  Y. vanderGraaf,et al.  The influence of sample takers on the cellular composition of cervical smears. , 1986 .

[5]  H. J. Kwikkel,et al.  Predictive value of the abnormal PAP smear: a retrospective analysis of error rates. , 1986, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears. , 1985, Acta cytologica.

[7]  E. Hudson.  The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test. , 1985, Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  F. House,et al.  THE MULTISPATULA: A NEW DIMENSION IN SAMPLING THE CERVIX , 1984, The Lancet.

[9]  P. Vooijs,et al.  The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. , 1983, Acta cytologica.

[10]  R. Bourne,et al.  Paired Cervical Smears: A Method of Reducing the False-Negative Rate in Population Screening , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Taylor,et al.  False-Negative Cytology Rates in Patients in Whom Invasive Cervical Cancer Subsequently Developed , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Ca.  False negatives in cervical cytology: can they be avoided? , 1981 .

[13]  R. Bourne,et al.  TRIAL OF NEW CERVICAL SPATULA , 1976, The Lancet.

[14]  D. Evans,et al.  Quality control in cervical cytology , 1974, Journal of clinical pathology.

[15]  F. Rank,et al.  Brush cytology from the uterine cervix. , 1986, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.