Design and Evaluation of Expressive Turn-Taking Hardware for a Telepresence Robot

Although nonverbal expressive abilities are an essential element of human-to-human communication, telepresence robots support only select nonverbal behaviors. As a result, telepresence users can experience difficulties taking turns in conversation and using various cues to obtain the attention of others. To expand telepresence robot users’ abilities to hold the floor during conversation, this work proposes and evaluates new types of expressive telepresence robot hardware. The described within-subjects study compared robot user and co-present person experiences during teamwork activity conditions involving basic robot functions, expressive LED lights, and an expressive robot arm. We found that among participants who preferred the arm-based expressiveness, individuals in both study roles felt the robot operator to be more in control of the robot during the arm condition, and participants co-located with the robot felt closer to their teammate during the arm phase. Participants also noted advantages of the LED lights for notification-type information and advantages of the arm for increasing perceptions of the robot as a human-like entity. Overall, these findings can inform future work on augmenting the nonverbal expressiveness of telepresence robots.

[1]  Suzie Drummond,et al.  Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot , 2014, BMC Geriatrics.

[2]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Turn-Taking Based on Information Flow for Fluent Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, AI Mag..

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  MeBot: a robotic platform for socially embodied presence , 2010, HRI.

[4]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[5]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Blinking light patterns as artificial subtle expressions in human-robot speech interaction , 2011, 2011 RO-MAN.

[6]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Personalized Appearance on Telepresence Robots for Education , 2018, HRI.

[7]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  To Beam or Not to Beam: A Study of Remote Telepresence Attendance at an Academic Conference , 2016, CSCW.

[8]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Modeling and Evaluating Narrative Gestures for Humanlike Robots , 2013, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[10]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Virtual Inclusion via Telepresence Robots in the Classroom: An Exploratory Case Study , 2016 .

[11]  Leila Takayama,et al.  "Now, i have a body": uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace , 2011, CHI.

[12]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Smoothing human-robot speech interactions by using a blinking-light as subtle expression , 2008, ICMI '08.

[14]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  A Survey of Nonverbal Signaling Methods for Non-Humanoid Robots , 2018, Found. Trends Robotics.

[15]  John Bell,et al.  From 2D to Kubi to Doubles: Designs for Student Telepresence in Synchronous Hybrid Classrooms , 2016 .

[16]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  1 Self-Presence Standardized : Introducing the Self-Presence Questionnaire ( SPQ ) , 2009 .

[17]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  MeBot: A robotic platform for socially embodied telepresence , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  M. Knapp,et al.  Turn-Taking in Conversations. , 1975 .

[19]  John C. Tang,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Designing Telepresence , 2015, CSCW.

[20]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Presentation of (telepresent) self: On the double-edged effects of mirrors , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Gabriel Skantze,et al.  Turn-taking, feedback and joint attention in situated human-robot interaction , 2014, Speech Commun..

[22]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).