Vibration testing of an in situ bridge pier to determine soil-structure interaction effects

The lateral dynamic response characteristics of a single span from the decommissioned Puhinui Stream Bridge in Manukau, New Zealand were determined through a series of forced vibration tests performed along the longitudinal axis of the bridge using an eccentric mass shaker. Following forced vibration testing, the dynamic characteristics of a three column pier group from the span were determined using snapback testing. Responses of the bridge span and pier group measured during the vibration testing were used to construct finite element models accounting for soil-structure interaction using a Winkler spring idealisation of the soil. Because of the simplified nature of the pier group, it was modelled first, and used to perform sensitivity analyses to obtain realistic bounds for soil and material properties based upon CPT data and concrete specifications. The pier group model will be extended to capture the response measured by the forced vibration testing of the bridge span but is not discussed here.

[1]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  The vibrational behaviour of three composite beam-slab bridges , 1981 .

[2]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[3]  Y. C. Das,et al.  Beams on Elastic Foundations: A New Approach , 1989 .

[4]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[5]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF FULL-SCALE BRIDGE BENTS: The Forced-Vibration Technique , 2000 .

[6]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  NATURAL EXCITATION TECHNIQUE AND EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PHASE I OF THE IASC-ASCE BENCHMARK PROBLEM: SIMULATED DATA , 2004 .

[7]  Mahmod M. Samman,et al.  VIBRATION TESTING FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF BRIDGES. I: THEORY , 1994 .

[8]  M. Budhu,et al.  Non-linear analysis of laterally loaded piles in heavily overconsolidated clays , 1986 .

[9]  Sanghyun Choi,et al.  Modal Property Changes of a Seismically Damaged Concrete Bridge , 2005 .

[10]  Mahir Ülker-Kaustell,et al.  Simplified analysis of the dynamic soil–structure interaction of a portal frame railway bridge , 2010 .

[11]  Sherif Beskhyroun,et al.  Graphical Interface Toolbox for Modal Analysis , 2011 .

[12]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Seismic performance of bar-mat reinforced-soil retaining wall: Shaking table testing versus numerical analysis with modified kinematic hardening constitutive model , 2010 .

[13]  Michael Inwood,et al.  Review of the New Zealand Standard for Concrete Structures (NZS 3101) for High Strength and Lightweight Concrete Exposed to Fire , 1999 .

[14]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  Assessment and modeling of embankment participation in the seismic response of integral abutment bridges , 2009 .

[15]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Seismic assessment of bridges accounting for nonlinear material and soil response, and varying boundary conditions , 2009 .

[16]  Tohru Katayama,et al.  Subspace Methods for System Identification , 2005 .