Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients with GIST Harboring Exon 9 KIT Mutations: Results from a Multi-institutional European Retrospective Study

Abstract Purpose: The effect of high-dose imatinib (800 mg/day) on survival in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected KIT exon 9–mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not established. Here, the association of dose and other clinicopathologic variables with survival was evaluated in a large multi-institutional European cohort. Experimental Design: Data from 185 patients were retrospectively collected in 23 European GIST reference centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for confounders. Univariate and multivariate unweighted and weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were estimated for relapse-free survival (RFS), modified-RFS (mRFS) and imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS). Univariate Cox models were estimated for overall survival. Results: Of the 185 patients, 131 (70.8%) received a starting dose of 400 mg/d and the remaining 54 (29.2%) a dose of 800 mg/d. Baseline characteristics were partially unbalanced, suggesting a potential selection bias. PSM and IPTW analyses showed no advantage of imatinib 800 mg/d. In the weighted multivariate Cox models, high-dose imatinib was not associated with the survival outcomes [RFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–1.94; mRFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92–3.10; IFFS: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.79–2.28]. The variables consistently associated with worse survival outcomes were high mitotic index and nongastric tumor location. Conclusions: In this retrospective series of patients with KIT exon 9–mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib, a daily dose of 800 mg versus 400 mg did not show better results in terms of survival outcomes. Prospective evaluation of the more appropriate adjuvant treatment in this setting is warranted.

[1]  J. Blay,et al.  Starting Imatinib at 400 mg Daily in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Harboring KIT Exon 9 Mutations: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study , 2021, Targeted Oncology.

[2]  E. Wardelmann,et al.  Survival Outcomes Associated With 3 Years vs 1 Year of Adjuvant Imatinib for Patients With High-Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: An Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial After 10-Year Follow-up. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[3]  B. Vincenzi,et al.  New frontiers in the medical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours , 2019, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[4]  C. Dobler,et al.  Clinicians’ cognitive biases: a potential barrier to implementation of evidence-based clinical practice , 2018, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[5]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician , 2018, Advances in Therapy.

[6]  Robin L. Jones,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  E. Wardelmann,et al.  Adjuvant Imatinib for High-Risk GI Stromal Tumor: Analysis of a Randomized Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  P. Casali,et al.  Imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib as a second line treatment in KIT exon 11 mutated GIST: a retrospective analysis , 2015, Oncotarget.

[9]  C. Antonescu,et al.  Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  E. Wardelmann,et al.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors With KIT Exon 9 Mutations: Update on Genotype-Phenotype Correlation and Validation of a High-Resolution Melting Assay for Mutational Testing , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Gary King,et al.  MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference , 2011 .

[15]  J. Blay,et al.  The role of high‐dose imatinib in the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor , 2010, Cancer.

[16]  F. Duffaud Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Antonescu,et al.  Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[18]  Joseph Schlessinger,et al.  Structural Basis for Activation of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase KIT by Stem Cell Factor , 2007, Cell.

[19]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Molecular correlates of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Lasota,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. , 2006, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[21]  L. Rönnstrand,et al.  Co expression of SCF and KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) suggests an autocrine/paracrine mechanism , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  E. Musulen,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors , 2006, Abdominal Imaging.

[23]  K. Wilson,et al.  Structural Basis for the Autoinhibition and STI-571 Inhibition of c-Kit Tyrosine Kinase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  N. Socci,et al.  Gene Expression in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Is Distinguished by KIT Genotype and Anatomic Site , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  D. Tuveson,et al.  Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Duc Hung Le,et al.  SHP-1 Binds and Negatively Modulates the c-Kit Receptor by Interaction with Tyrosine 569 in the c-Kit Juxtamembrane Domain , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  M Schemper,et al.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[29]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .