Competing rhythmic neural representations of orientations during concurrent attention to multiple orientation features

When a feature is attended, all locations containing this feature are enhanced throughout the visual field. However, how the brain concurrently attends to multiple features remains unknown and cannot be easily deduced from classical attention theories. Here, we recorded human magnetoencephalography signals when subjects concurrently attended to two spatially overlapping orientations. A time-resolved multivariate inverted encoding model was employed to track the ongoing temporal courses of the neural representations of the attended orientations. We show that the two orientation representations alternate with each other and undergo a theta-band (~4 Hz) rhythmic fluctuation over time. Similar temporal profiles are also revealed in the orientation discrimination performance. Computational modeling suggests a tuning competition process between the two neuronal populations that are selectively tuned to one of the attended orientations. Taken together, our findings reveal for the first time a rhythm-based, time-multiplexing neural machinery underlying concurrent multi-feature attention. The neural mechanisms for concurrently attending to multiple features in the visual stimuli are not well understood. Here, the authors show that the neural representations for two overlapping stimulus features alternate with each other at a ~4 Hz rhythm that was also observed in fluctuations in the task performance.

[1]  Huan Luo,et al.  Behavioral Oscillations in Attention: Rhythmic α Pulses Mediated through θ Band , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Azeem Zaman,et al.  Single neurons may encode simultaneous stimuli by switching between activity patterns , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  Nicholas J Priebe,et al.  Mechanisms of Orientation Selectivity in the Primary Visual Cortex. , 2016, Annual review of vision science.

[4]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Serences,et al.  Near-Real-Time Feature-Selective Modulations in Human Cortex , 2013, Current Biology.

[7]  Pascal Fries,et al.  A theta rhythm in macaque visual cortex and its attentional modulation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002, Psychological review.

[10]  Fang Fang,et al.  Sequential sampling of visual objects during sustained attention , 2017, PLoS biology.

[11]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[12]  Peter Neri,et al.  Attentional control of sensory tuning in human visual perception. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Gallant,et al.  Time Course of Attention Reveals Different Mechanisms for Spatial and Feature-Based Attention in Area V4 , 2005, Neuron.

[14]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[15]  John T. Serences,et al.  Reconstructions of Information in Visual Spatial Working Memory Degrade with Memory Load , 2014, Current Biology.

[16]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location , 2013, Current Biology.

[17]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2015, Neuron.

[18]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[20]  P. Fries,et al.  Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2012, Current Biology.

[21]  Franco Pestilli,et al.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[22]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multisubject Learning for Common Spatial Patterns in Motor-Imagery BCI , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[24]  Pavan Ramkumar,et al.  Feature-Specific Information Processing Precedes Concerted Activation in Human Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[26]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to Color Sharpens Neural Population Tuning via Feedback Processing in the Human Visual Cortex Hierarchy , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Tracking an object through feature space , 2000, Nature.

[29]  R. VanRullen Perceptual Cycles , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[32]  S. Yantis,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  John T. Serences,et al.  Attention modulates spatial priority maps in the human occipital, parietal and frontal cortices , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Kastner,et al.  From Behavior to Neural Dynamics: An Integrated Theory of Attention , 2015, Neuron.

[35]  Masih Rahmati,et al.  Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning , 2018, eNeuro.

[36]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The blinking spotlight of attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  D. Heeger,et al.  Feature-based attention enhances performance by increasing response gain , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  Jack J. Lin,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic , 2018, Neuron.

[40]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Inverted Encoding Models Reconstruct an Arbitrary Model Response, Not the Stimulus , 2019, eNeuro.

[42]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[43]  P. Fries Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence , 2015, Neuron.

[44]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Using Neuronal Populations to Study the Mechanisms Underlying Spatial and Feature Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[45]  Craig G. Richter,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2019, Current Biology.

[46]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[47]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Feature-Based Attention in the Frontal Eye Field and Area V4 during Visual Search , 2011, Neuron.

[48]  M. Pinsk,et al.  A Dynamic Interplay within the Frontoparietal Network Underlies Rhythmic Spatial Attention , 2018, Neuron.

[49]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Ayelet Landau Distributed attention is implemented through theta-rhythmic gamma modulation. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[51]  Andrew C. Heusser,et al.  Episodic sequence memory is supported by a theta-gamma phase code , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  R. Saunders,et al.  Theta Rhythmic Neuronal Activity and Reaction Times Arising from Cortical Receptive Field Interactions during Distributed Attention , 2018, Current Biology.

[53]  M. Carrasco,et al.  How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses , 2009, Vision Research.

[54]  J. Gallant,et al.  Attention to Stimulus Features Shifts Spectral Tuning of V4 Neurons during Natural Vision , 2008, Neuron.

[55]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Phase Locking of Single Neuron Activity to Theta Oscillations during Working Memory in Monkey Extrastriate Visual Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[56]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[57]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Theta-Gamma Neural Code , 2013, Neuron.

[59]  Pascal Fries,et al.  Communication through coherence with inter-areal delays , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[60]  Julio Martinez-Trujillo Searching for the Neural Mechanisms of Feature-Based Attention in the Primate Brain , 2011, Neuron.