A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Respiratory Effects of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women

BACKGROUND:Safe and effective alternatives are required in labor when epidural analgesia is not appropriate. We hypothesized that patient-controlled IV remifentanil labor analgesia would not be inferior to patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia. METHODS:This randomized nonblinded controlled noninferiority study in healthy women with a singleton fetus and vertex presentation was performed at 1 site. Women were randomized to receive patient-controlled IV analgesia titrated from 20 mcg up to a maximum bolus dose of 60 mcg with a lockout interval of 1 to 2 minutes, or patient-controlled epidural analgesia 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 mcg/mL fentanyl (initiation bolus 15 mL; maintenance bolus 10 mL, lockout interval 20 minutes, basal infusion 5 mL/h). Crossover was permitted after 30 minutes. The primary study outcome was efficacy (assessed as hourly numerical rating scale [NRS] pain score [11-point NRS] and maternal satisfaction [11-point NRS]); the secondary outcome was safety (maternal apnea). Supplementary oxygen was administered continuously during the respiratory monitoring period. During the first hour of analgesia, the heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry (SpO2), and end-tidal CO2, as an indication of apnea, were compared. Apnea lasting >40 seconds was managed by light stimulation by the attending anesthesiologist. RESULTS:Forty women were recruited to the following groups: remifentanil n = 19 (1 exclusion), epidural n = 20. Four crossed over: 3 from the remifentanil to epidural group and 1 from the epidural to remifentanil group. Mean (± SD) baseline NRS pain scores were similar, 8.4 ± 1.5 for remifentanil and 8.7 ± 1.2 for epidural analgesia, P = 0.52. Baseline adjusted mean NRS reduction at 30 minutes for remifentanil was −4.5 (± 0.6) vs −7.1(± 0.6) for epidural analgesia, P < 0.0001 for both. Pain score at 30 minutes was 3.7 ± 2.8 for remifentanil and 1.5 ± 2.2 for epidural analgesia, P = 0.009. Remifentanil was inferior to epidural analgesia with respect to the NRS at all time points, because the observed difference in NRS was greater than the expected −1.5 units. Maternal satisfaction was 8.6 ± 1.4 for the remifentanil group and 9.1 ± 1.5 for epidural group, P = 0.26. Mean respiratory rate was lower in the remifentanil group, 18 ± 4 vs 21 ± 4 breaths/min in the epidural group, P = 0.03. Mean SpO2 was lower in the remifentanil group 96.8% ± 1.4 vs 98.4 ± 1.2 for epidural group, P < 0.0001. There were 9 apnea events; all occurred in 5 women receiving remifentanil (5/19 [26.3%], P = 0.046). Apgar scores and neonatal respiratory outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION:IV remifentanil is inferior to epidural analgesia for provision of labor analgesia; however, remifentanil does provide a satisfactory level of labor analgesia. Laboring women receiving remifentanil require suitable monitoring to detect and alert for apnea.

[1]  Rashonda M Lewis,et al.  Nitrous Oxide for the Management of Labor Pain: A Systematic Review , 2014, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  S. Seiler,et al.  Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl , 2012, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[3]  A. Sia,et al.  A Comparison Between Remifentanil and Meperidine for Labor Analgesia: A Systematic Review , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  O. Palomäki,et al.  Alternatives to neuraxial analgesia for labor , 2011, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[5]  A. Dahan,et al.  A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour. , 2011, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[6]  F. Reynolds The effects of maternal labour analgesia on the fetus. , 2010, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[7]  P. Linden,et al.  Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. , 2010, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  F. Mecacci,et al.  The Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Intravenous Administration of Remifentanil for Birth Pain Relief: An Open Study of 205 Parturients , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  R. Fernando,et al.  Systemic Remifentanil for Labor Analgesia , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  Y. Kasuya,et al.  Accuracy of Postoperative End-tidal Pco2 Measurements with Mainstream and Sidestream Capnography in Non-obese Patients and in Obese Patients with and without Obstructive Sleep Apnea , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[11]  D. Hill Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be routinely available for use in labour. , 2008, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[12]  D. Hill Remifentanil in obstetrics , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[13]  F. Torres,et al.  A randomized comparison of levobupivacaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine with fentanyl, for labor analgesia. , 2008, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[14]  K. Korttila,et al.  Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double‐blinded study , 2008, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  A. Herman,et al.  The effects of remifentanil or acetaminophen with epidural ropivacaine on body temperature during labor , 2008, Journal of Anesthesia.

[16]  M. Balki,et al.  Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens , 2007, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[17]  S. Mahboobi,et al.  Use of remifentanil for labor analgesia: the good and the bad. , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  D. Chestnut Comparison of Remifentanil and Nitrous Oxide in Labour AnalgesiaVolmanen P, Akural E, Raudaskoski T, et al (Lapland Central Hosp, Rovaniemi, Finland; Univ of Oulu, Finland) Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49:453–458, 2005§ , 2006 .

[19]  Y. Demiraran,et al.  A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  S. Alahuhta,et al.  Comparison of remifentanil and nitrous oxide in labour analgesia , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[21]  J. Fee,et al.  Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine * , 2005, Anaesthesia.

[22]  E. Hodnett Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  N. Goodman,et al.  Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[24]  A. Ross,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Remifentanil in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery or Diagnostic Procedures , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  D. Hill,et al.  Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  C. Wright,et al.  FDA's role in anesthetic drug development. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[27]  E. Lobo,et al.  Intravenous Remifentanil: Placental Transfer, Maternal and Neonatal Effects , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[28]  A. Fox,et al.  Naloxone-induced and spontaneous reversal of depressed ventilatory responses to hypoxia during and after continuous infusion of remifentanil or alfentanil. , 1995, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[29]  Y Y Phillips,et al.  Oxygen consumption and ventilation during normal labor. , 1992, Chest.

[30]  Ronald Melzack,et al.  The myth of painless childbirth (The John J. Bonica Lecture) , 1984, Pain.