Convergence of best-response dynamics in games with conflicting congestion effects

We study the model of resource allocation games with conflicting congestion effects that was introduced by Feldman and Tamir 9. In this model, an agent's cost consists of its resource's load (which increases with congestion) and its share in the resource's activation cost (which decreases with congestion). The current work studies the convergence rate of best-response dynamics (BRD) in the case of homogeneous agents. Even within this simple setting, interesting phenomena arise. We show that, in contrast to standard congestion games with identical jobs and resources, the convergence rate of BRD under conflicting congestion effects might be super-linear in the number of jobs. Nevertheless, a specific form of BRD is proposed, which is guaranteed to converge in linear time. We analyze the convergence rate of best-response dynamics (BRD) in job scheduling games with homogeneous agents.In games with either positive or negative congestion effect, BRD is known to converge to a Nash equilibrium in linear time.We consider games in which positive and negative congestion effects occur simultaneously.We show that the convergence rate of BRD in this case might be super-linear.Yet, we propose a specific dynamic, referred to as max-cost BRD, where convergence occurs in linear time.

[1]  Tami Tamir,et al.  Conflicting Congestion Effects in Resource Allocation Games , 2008, Oper. Res..

[2]  Berthold Vöcking Algorithmic Game Theory: Selfish Load Balancing , 2007 .

[3]  Dimitris Fotakis Congestion Games with Linearly Independent Paths: Convergence Time and Price of Anarchy , 2009, Theory of Computing Systems.

[4]  Steve Chien,et al.  Convergence to approximate Nash equilibria in congestion games , 2007, SODA '07.

[5]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[6]  Rolf H. Möhring,et al.  Strong Nash Equilibria in Games with the Lexicographical Improvement Property , 2009, WINE.

[7]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[8]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Fast convergence to nearly optimal solutions in potential games , 2008, EC '08.

[9]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case equilibria , 1999 .

[10]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  Congestible services and network effects , 2010, EC '10.

[11]  Vasilis Syrgkanis,et al.  The Complexity of Equilibria in Cost Sharing Games , 2010, WINE.

[12]  L. Shapley,et al.  REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .

[13]  Martin Hoefer,et al.  Stability and Convergence in Selfish Scheduling with Altruistic Agents , 2009, WINE.

[14]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Fast and Compact: A Simple Class of Congestion Games , 2005, AAAI.

[15]  Tami Tamir,et al.  Conflicting Congestion Effects in Resource Allocation Games , 2012, Oper. Res..

[16]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  The complexity of pure Nash equilibria , 2004, STOC '04.

[17]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  The structure and complexity of Nash equilibria for a selfish routing game , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[19]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Convergence Time to Nash Equilibria , 2003, ICALP.

[20]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games , 2007, EC '07.

[21]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  How bad is selfish routing? , 2002, JACM.

[22]  Berthold Vöcking,et al.  On the Impact of Combinatorial Structure on Congestion Games , 2006, FOCS.

[23]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[24]  Sinan Gürel,et al.  Efficiency analysis of load balancing games with and without activation costs , 2012, J. Sched..