Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction.

Trivialization as a mode of dissonance reduction and the conditions under which it is likely to occur were explored in 4 studies. Study 1 tested and supported the hypothesis that when the preexisting attitude is made salient, participants will trivialize the dissonant cognitions rather than change their attitudes. Study 2 tested and supported the hypothesis that following a counterattitudinal behavior, participants will choose the first mode of dissonance reduction provided for them, whether it is trivialization or attitude change. Study 3 tested and supported the hypothesis that following a counterattitudinal behavior, the typical self-affirmation treatment leads to trivialization. Study 4 demonstrated that providing a trivializing frame by making an important issue salient also encourages trivialization rather than attitude change even when there was no opportunity for self-affirmation. The implications for cognitive dissonance theory and research are briefly discussed

[1]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[2]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction. , 1980 .

[3]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[4]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Motivational basis of dissonance: the singular role of behavioral consequences. , 1989 .

[5]  A. Tesser,et al.  On the confluence of self processes , 1991 .

[6]  S. Sherman,et al.  Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes , 1980 .

[7]  J. Laird,et al.  Awareness and attitude change in the forced-compliance paradigm: The importance of when. , 1976 .

[8]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[9]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[10]  M. Pallak,et al.  General motivational effects of dissonance arousal. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  P. Gove.  Webster's Third New International Dictionary , 1986 .

[12]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Dissonance awareness: A test of dissonance theory versus self-perception theory ☆ , 1972 .

[13]  Karen Horney,et al.  The Neurotic Personality of Our Time , 1937 .

[14]  G. Āllport,et al.  Study Of Values , 1931 .

[15]  L. Festinger,et al.  Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  C M Steele,et al.  Self-image resilience and dissonance: the role of affirmational resources. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[18]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  DISSONANCE PROCESSES AS SELF-AFFIRMATION , 1983 .

[19]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[20]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1 , 1969 .

[21]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[22]  J. Cooper,et al.  Cognitive dissonance in an intergroup context. , 1983 .

[23]  Bettina Götz‐Marchand,et al.  Preference of dissonance reduction modes as a function of their order, familiarity and reversibility† , 1974 .

[24]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. , 1980 .