Advanced Imaging Assessment of Bone Quality

Abstract:  Noninvasive and/or nondestructive techniques can provide structural information about bone, beyond simple bone densitometry. While the latter provides important information about osteoporotic fracture risk, many studies indicate that bone mineral density (BMD) only partly explains bone strength. Quantitative assessment of macrostructural characteristics, such as geometry, and microstructural features, such as relative trabecular volume, trabecular spacing, and connectivity, may improve our ability to estimate bone strength. Methods for quantitatively assessing macrostructure include (besides conventional radiographs) dual X ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT), particularly volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). Methods for assessing microstructure of trabecular bone noninvasively and/or nondestructively include high‐resolution computed tomography (hrCT), microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT), high‐resolution magnetic resonance (hrMR), and micromagnetic resonance (micro‐MR). vQCT, hrCT, and hrMR are generally applicable in vivo; micro‐CT and micro‐MR are principally applicable in vitro. Despite progress, problems remain. The important balances between spatial resolution and sampling size, or between signal‐to‐noise and radiation dose or acquisition time, need further consideration, as do the complexity and expense of the methods versus their availability and accessibility. Clinically, the challenges for bone imaging include balancing the advantages of simple bone densitometry versus the more complex architectural features of bone, or the deeper research requirements versus the broader clinical needs. The biological differences between the peripheral appendicular skeleton and the central axial skeleton must be further addressed. Finally, the relative merits of these sophisticated imaging techniques must be weighed with respect to their applications as diagnostic procedures, requiring high accuracy or reliability, versus their monitoring applications, requiring high precision or reproducibility.

[1]  D. Bauer,et al.  Change in Bone Turnover and Hip, Non‐Spine, and Vertebral Fracture in Alendronate‐Treated Women: The Fracture Intervention Trial , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three‐dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D‐pQCT , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Micro-CT examinations of trabecular bone samples at different resolutions: 14, 7 and 2 micron level. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[5]  F. Wehrli,et al.  Three‐dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging of trabecular bone , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  K Engelke,et al.  A digital model of trabecular bone , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  J. Kinney,et al.  Intermittent treatment with human parathyroid hormone (hPTH[1‐34]) increased trabecular bone volume but not connectivity in osteopenic rats , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Calcaneus: Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Structure and Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  R. Agarwala,et al.  Reduced Incidence of Hip Fracture in the Old Order Amish , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  M. Ito,et al.  Trabecular texture analysis of CT images in the relationship with spinal fracture. , 1995, Radiology.

[13]  Matthew J. Silva,et al.  SHIP-deficient mice are severely osteoporotic due to increased numbers of hyper-resorptive osteoclasts , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  H. Song,et al.  Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. , 1998, Radiology.

[17]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. , 1993, Bone.

[18]  P. Geusens,et al.  Femoral Neck Trabecular Microstructure in Ovariectomized Ewes Treated With Calcitonin: MRI Microscopic Evaluation , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  C. Glüer,et al.  Characterization of the Integrity of Three-Dimensional Trabecular Bone Microstructure by Connectivity and Shape Analysis Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging In Vivo , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[21]  A. Oberg,et al.  Relationship of Volumetric BMD and Structural Parameters at Different Skeletal Sites to Sex Steroid Levels in Men , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images. , 2002, Bone.

[23]  Structural Analysis of High Resolution In Vitro MR Images Compared to Stained Grindings , 2001, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  Bruce H. Hasegawa,et al.  CT-derived finite element models to determine vertebral cortex strength , 1990, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[25]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: Which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? , 2003, European Radiology.

[26]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Architecture and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Indices of Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Radius , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  Laurent Pothuaud,et al.  Three‐Dimensional‐Line Skeleton Graph Analysis of High‐Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images: A Validation Study From 34‐μm‐Resolution Microcomputed Tomography , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone Remodeling Increases Substantially in the Years After Menopause and Remains Increased in Older Osteoporosis Patients , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[33]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  Scott N. Hwang,et al.  Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength. , 1997, Medical physics.

[35]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and histologic sections. , 1996, Bone.

[36]  Peter Rüegsegger Bone architecture and the competence of bone , 1998 .

[37]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[38]  江橋 節郎,et al.  Handbook on synchrotron radiation , 1983 .

[39]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Mineral and Calculated Structure of Human Bone Specimens Scanned by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: Relation to Biomechanical Properties , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[40]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Structure Analysis of High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Proximal Femur: In Vitro Correlation with Biomechanical Strength and BMD , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[41]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Analysis of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius using high-resolution MRI , 1994, European Radiology.

[42]  M. Jergas,et al.  Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X‐ray absorptiometry , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  Scott N. Hwang,et al.  Digital Topological Analysis of In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Microimages of Trabecular Bone Reveals Structural Implications of Osteoporosis , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[44]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Zmpste24 deficiency in mice causes spontaneous bone fractures, muscle weakness, and a prelamin A processing defect , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  C. Simmons,et al.  Method‐Based Differences in the Automated Analysis of the Three‐Dimensional Morphology of Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[46]  M. Laval-jeantet,et al.  CT image analysis of the vertebral trabecular network in vivo , 1992, Calcified Tissue International.

[47]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. , 2003, Bone.

[48]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[49]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  H. Genant,et al.  Image-Based Assessment of Spinal Trabecular Bone Structure from High-Resolution CT Images , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[51]  J. Kinney,et al.  In vivo, three‐dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[52]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[53]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  F. Wehrli,et al.  High‐resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[55]  H K Genant,et al.  Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. , 2002, Bone.

[56]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[57]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[58]  T S Smith,et al.  Three‐dimensional microimaging (MRμI and μCT), finite element modeling, and rapid prototyping provide unique insights into bone architecture in osteoporosis , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[59]  U. Bonse,et al.  3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and 10(-4) energy resolution. , 1994, Bone and mineral.

[60]  H. Genant,et al.  Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone (1–34) [Teriparatide] Improves Both Cortical and Cancellous Bone Structure , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[61]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Processing and Analysis of In Vivo High-Resolution MR Images of Trabecular Bone for Longitudinal Studies: Reproducibility of Structural Measures and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Mechanical Properties , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[62]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[63]  M. Hahn,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Imaging of Bone Mineral Using Computed Microtomography: Comparison with Microradiography and Undecalcified Histologic Sections , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[64]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Bone.

[65]  Martin Heller,et al.  Hochauflösende Darstellung und Quantifizierung der trabekulären Knochenstruktur der Fingerphalangen mit der Magnetresonanztomographie , 1997 .

[66]  A. Wright,et al.  Role of Magnetic Resonance for Assessing Structure and Function of Trabecular Bone , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[67]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element models of the human lumbar vertebral body: effect of element size on stiffness, damage, and fracture strength predictions. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.