Modulation transfer function determination using the edge technique for cone-beam micro-CT

Evaluating spatial resolution is an essential work for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) manufacturers, prototype designers or equipment users. To investigate the cross-sectional spatial resolution for different transaxial slices with CBCT, the slanted edge technique with a 3D slanted edge phantom are proposed and implemented on a prototype cone-beam micro-CT. Three transaxial slices with different cone angles are under investigation. An over-sampled edge response function (ERF) is firstly generated from the intensity of the slightly tiled air to plastic edge in each row of the transaxial reconstruction image. Then the oversampled ESF is binned and smoothed. The derivative of the binned and smoothed ERF gives the line spread function (LSF). At last the presampled modulation transfer function (MTF) is calculated by taking the modulus of the Fourier transform of the LSF. The spatial resolution is quantified with the spatial frequencies at 10% MTF level and full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) value. The spatial frequencies at 10% of MTFs are 3.1±0.08mm-1, 3.0±0.05mm-1, and 3.2±0.04mm-1 for the three transaxial slices at cone angles of 3.8°, 0°, and -3.8° respectively. The corresponding FWHMs are 252.8μm, 261.7μm and 253.6μm. Results indicate that cross-sectional spatial resolution has no much differences when transaxial slices being 3.8° away from z=0 plane for the prototype conebeam micro-CT.

[1]  魏龙,et al.  Measurement of spatial resolution of the micro-CT system * , 2010 .

[2]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[3]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom. , 2013, Medical physics.

[4]  Ying Xiao,et al.  Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and-neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a prospective study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Alain Seret,et al.  Performance Evaluation and X-ray Dose Quantification for Various Scanning Protocols of the GE eXplore 120 Micro-CT , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Lei Xing,et al.  Formulating adaptive radiation therapy (ART) treatment planning into a closed-loop control framework , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[8]  C T Badea,et al.  Micro-CT of rodents: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[9]  Hristo N Nikolov,et al.  A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  O Majdani,et al.  Large scan field, high spatial resolution flat-panel detector based volumetric CT of the whole human skull base and for maxillofacial imaging. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  Norbert J. Pelc,et al.  Use of sphere phantoms to measure the 3D MTF of FDK reconstructions , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Reduced image noise at low-dose multidetector CT of the abdomen with prior image constrained compressed sensing algorithm. , 2011, Radiology.