Successional dynamics in Neotropical forests are as uncertain as they are predictable

Significance Although forest succession has been approached as a predictable process, successional trajectories vary widely, even among nearby stands with similar environmental conditions and disturbance histories. We quantified predictability and uncertainty during tropical forest succession using dynamical models describing the interactions among stem density, basal area, and species density over time. We showed that the trajectories of these forest attributes were poorly predicted by stand age and varied significantly within and among sites. Our models reproduced the general successional trends observed, but high levels of noise were needed to increase model predictability. These levels of uncertainty call into question the premise that successional processes are consistent over space and time, and challenge the way ecologists view tropical forest regeneration. Although forest succession has traditionally been approached as a deterministic process, successional trajectories of vegetation change vary widely, even among nearby stands with similar environmental conditions and disturbance histories. Here, we provide the first attempt, to our knowledge, to quantify predictability and uncertainty during succession based on the most extensive long-term datasets ever assembled for Neotropical forests. We develop a novel approach that integrates deterministic and stochastic components into different candidate models describing the dynamical interactions among three widely used and interrelated forest attributes—stem density, basal area, and species density. Within each of the seven study sites, successional trajectories were highly idiosyncratic, even when controlling for prior land use, environment, and initial conditions in these attributes. Plot factors were far more important than stand age in explaining successional trajectories. For each site, the best-fit model was able to capture the complete set of time series in certain attributes only when both the deterministic and stochastic components were set to similar magnitudes. Surprisingly, predictability of stem density, basal area, and species density did not show consistent trends across attributes, study sites, or land use history, and was independent of plot size and time series length. The model developed here represents the best approach, to date, for characterizing autogenic successional dynamics and demonstrates the low predictability of successional trajectories. These high levels of uncertainty suggest that the impacts of allogenic factors on rates of change during tropical forest succession are far more pervasive than previously thought, challenging the way ecologists view and investigate forest regeneration.

[1]  David Edwards,et al.  Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism , 2014 .

[2]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  An introduction to genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[3]  R. Chazdon Chance and Determinism in Tropical Forest Succession , 2008 .

[4]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Temporal turnover in the composition of tropical tree communities: functional determinism and phylogenetic stochasticity. , 2012, Ecology.

[5]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[6]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[7]  Jan Raethjen,et al.  Extracting model equations from experimental data , 2000 .

[8]  R. Busing,et al.  The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography , 2002 .

[9]  M. Guariguata,et al.  Ecological knowledge of regeneration from seed in neotropical forest trees: implications for natural forest management , 1998 .

[10]  J. Lubroth,et al.  The work of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and transboundary animal diseases in a globalised world , 2011 .

[11]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , 2004 .

[12]  Miguel Martínez-Ramos,et al.  Testing Chronosequences through Dynamic Approaches: Time and Site Effects on Tropical Dry Forest Succession , 2015 .

[13]  J. Denslow Disturbance and Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests: The Density Effect , 1995 .

[14]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Functional diversity changes during tropical forest succession , 2012 .

[15]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  G. B. Williamson,et al.  Convergence and divergence in alternative successional pathways in Central Amazonia , 2014 .

[17]  B. Finegan Pattern and process in neotropical secondary rain forests: the first 100 years of succession. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[20]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  MULTIPLE BASINS OF ATTRACTION IN A TROPICAL FOREST: EVIDENCE FOR NONEQUILIBRIUM COMMUNITY STRUCTURE , 2004 .

[21]  S. Levin Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[22]  R. Ricklefs Naturalists, Natural History, and the Nature of Biological Diversity , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .

[24]  K. Ickes,et al.  Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin , 2001 .

[25]  Fangliang He,et al.  Estimating abundance from presence/absence maps , 2011 .

[26]  E. Johnson,et al.  Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[27]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[28]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Viewing forests through the lens of complex systems science , 2014 .

[29]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[30]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Forest resilience and tipping points at different spatio‐temporal scales: approaches and challenges , 2015 .

[32]  F. Bongers,et al.  Community dynamics during early secondary succession in Mexican tropical rain forests , 2006, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[33]  T. Feldpausch,et al.  Secondary forest growth deviation from chronosequence predictions in central Amazonia , 2007 .

[34]  María Uriarte,et al.  The relationship between tree biodiversity and biomass dynamics changes with tropical forest succession. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[35]  K. Anderson Temporal Patterns in Rates of Community Change during Succession , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[37]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[38]  James S. Clark,et al.  Resolving the biodiversity paradox. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[39]  R. Chazdon Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances , 2003 .

[40]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical system. , 2010, Ecology.