Yerkes-Dodson: A Law for all Seasons

The paper traces the vicissitudes of the Yerkes-Dodson law from 1908 to the present. In its original form, the law was intended to describe the relation between stimulus strength and habit-formation for tasks varying in discrimination difficultness. But later generations of investigations and textbook authors have rendered it variously as the effects of punishment, reward, motivation, drive, arousal, anxiety, tension or stress upon learning, performance, problem-solving, coping or memory; while the task variable has been commonly referred to as difficulty, complexity or novelty, when it is not omitted altogether. These changes are seldom explicitly discussed, and are often misattributed to Yerkes and Dodson themselves. The various reformulations are seen as reflecting conceptual changes and current developments in the areas of learning, motivation and emotion, and it is argued that the plasticity of the law also reflects the vagueness of basic psychological concepts in these areas.

[1]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[2]  Lawrence W. Cole,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rate of learning in the chick. , 1911 .

[3]  E. Thorndike Educational psychology, Vol 2: The psychology of learning. , 1913 .

[4]  Jacob D. Dodson The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation in the kitten. , 1915 .

[5]  J. D. Dodson,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relative Values of Reward and Punishment in Habit Formation , 1918 .

[6]  The relative effects of various intensities of punishment on learning and efficiency. , 1930 .

[7]  E. Thorndike The fundamentals of learning , 1972 .

[8]  E. Tolman Psychology versus Immediate Experience , 1935, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  E. Tolman The determiners of behavior at a choice point. , 1938 .

[10]  J. Taylor,et al.  The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  H. Schlosberg Three dimensions of emotion. , 1954, Psychological review.

[12]  D. Hebb Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Matarazzo,et al.  Human Maze Performance as a Function of Increasing Levels of Anxiety , 1955 .

[14]  P. L. Broadhurst,et al.  Emotionality and the Yerkes-Dodson law. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  E. Duffy,et al.  The psychological significance of the concept of arousal or activation. , 1957, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Stennett,et al.  The relationship of performance level to level of arousal. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  R. Haber Discrepancy from adaptation level as a source of affect. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  R. W. White Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[20]  P. L. Broadhurst The interaction of task difficulty and motivation: The Yerkes Dodson law revived. , 1959 .

[21]  W. P. Brown The Yerkes-Dodson Law Repealed , 1965, Psychological reports.

[22]  Mark Hochhauser,et al.  Cue Effects of Drive and Reward as a Function of Discrimination Difficulty: Evidence Against the Yerkes-Dodson Law. , 1975 .

[23]  W Revelle,et al.  Introversion/extroversion, time stress, and caffeine: effect on verbal performance. , 1976, Science.

[24]  B. Harris,et al.  Whatever happened to little Albert , 1979 .

[25]  F. Samelson J. B. Watson's Little Albert, Cyril Burt's twins, and the need for a critical science. , 1980 .

[26]  B. Brehmer In one word: Not from experience. , 1980 .

[27]  H. Fowler Facilitating Stimulus Effects of Reward and Punishment , 1982 .

[28]  R. Farr Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920) and the origins of psychology as an experimental and social science , 1983 .

[29]  W. Revelle,et al.  The interactive effects of caffeine, impulsivity and task demands on a visual search task , 1983 .

[30]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.

[31]  R. Geen,et al.  Preferred stimulation levels in introverts and extroverts: Effects on arousal and performance. , 1984 .

[32]  I. Mills The neuronal basis of compulsive behaviour in anorexia nervosa. , 1985, Journal of psychiatric research.

[33]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  The effects of extraversion and arousal on intelligence test performance , 1985 .

[34]  William Revelle,et al.  Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes-Dodson Effect , 1989 .

[35]  M. A. Saavedra,et al.  Sex differences in aversive and appetitive conditioning in two strains of rats , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[36]  R. Friend,et al.  A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch ‘conformity’ study , 1990 .

[37]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Reconstructive remembering of the scientific literature , 1993, Cognition.