Noise, Parasites and Translation

Conventional representations of consulting stress the need to predict possible organizational realities associated with improved economic performance. It is conceptualized as a useful tool from which practice might profit if applied properly. In this article we explore theory as a means by which practice may not so much be honed by wellcrafted advice as interrupted and transformed. Further, we propose a parasitical role for the management consultant as a source of ‘noise’ that disrupts established ways of doing and being by introducing interruptive action into the space between organizational order and chaos. What consulting can do is open up these spaces and create concepts that encourage new possible realities and real possibilities. The relation posited between organization theory and practice has the potential to create new forms of situated organization/organizing through disrupting established practice rather than by creating order. Consultants willing to take the risk of working in the productive space between organization and disorganization have a potential that questions the usual auspices of the enterprise.

[1]  T. Woodruff.  Reading and Writing. , 2018, Endocrinology.

[2]  Robert Dixon,et al.  The Management Task , 2003 .

[3]  H. Öztel,et al.  Changing organisations with metaphors , 2001 .

[4]  Carl Rhodes,et al.  Writing Organization: (re)Presentation and Control in Narratives at Work , 2001 .

[5]  S. Cottrell.  Reading for research , 2001 .

[6]  K. Dale.  Anatomising Embodiment and Organisation Theory , 2000 .

[7]  Andreas Werr,et al.  The Invincible Character of Management Consulting Rhetoric: How One Blends Incommensurates While Keeping them Apart , 2000 .

[8]  R. Pascale.  Surfing the Edge of Chaos , 2000 .

[9]  R. Bos.  Fashion and Utopia in Management Thinking , 2000 .

[10]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse as a Strategic Resource , 2000 .

[11]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Jazz Improvisation and Organizing: Once More from the Top , 2000 .

[12]  Carl Rhodes.  Reading and Writing Organizational Lives , 2000 .

[13]  L. Smircich,et al.  Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions , 1999 .

[14]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[15]  Richard J. Schonberger,et al.  Commentary on the Organization Science Special Issue on Complexity , 1999 .

[16]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Positivist Organization Theory , 1999 .

[17]  M. Hatch.  Exploring the Empty Spaces of Organizing: How Improvisational Jazz Helps Redescribe Organizational Structure , 1999 .

[18]  M van Gils,et al.  Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice , 1999 .

[19]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre , 1999 .

[20]  J. Garrick,et al.  Deconstructive Organisational Learning: The Possibilities for a Postmodern Epistemology of Practice. , 1998 .

[21]  Robert Chia,et al.  From Complexity Science to Complex Thinking: Organization as Simple Location , 1998 .

[22]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Introduction: Chaos, Complexity and Organization Theory , 1998 .

[23]  Gill Palmer,et al.  The Politics of Management Knowledge. , 1998 .

[24]  K. Weick,et al.  Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[25]  Anil Gaba,et al.  Coda : Creativity and Improvisation in Jazzand Organizations: Implications Fororganizational Learning , 1998 .

[26]  F. Barrett.  Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[27]  K. Weick.  Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  M. Hatch,et al.  Organization Theory : Modern , Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives , 2019 .

[29]  R. Stacey.  Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[30]  T. Clark,et al.  The use of metaphor in the client-consultant relationship: A study of management consultants , 1996 .

[31]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  For positivist organization theory , 1996 .

[32]  Nick Lee,et al.  Otherness and the Actor Network , 1994 .

[33]  J. Hassard,et al.  The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical Issues and New Perspectives , 1994 .

[34]  F. Nietzsche,et al.  Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche's Notebooks of the Early 1870's , 1993 .

[35]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[36]  Gilles Deleuze,et al.  From What is Philosophy , 2008 .

[37]  Colin S. Brown,et al.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1991 .

[38]  Nils Brunsson.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1989 .

[39]  Richard Whitley,et al.  The Management Sciences and Managerial Skills , 1988 .

[40]  Robert Cooper,et al.  Organization/Disorganization , 1986 .

[41]  W. Starbuck.  Organizations as Action Generators , 1983 .

[42]  C. Taylor.  Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche's Notebooks of the Early 1870s. , 1981 .

[43]  N. Goodman,et al.  Ways of Worldmaking , 1978 .

[44]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  J. March.  The Technology of Foolishness , 2020 .

[46]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[47]  Gilles Deleuze,et al.  Difference and Repetition , 1968 .

[48]  Peter McHugh.  Defining the situation , 1968 .

[49]  M. Douglas,et al.  Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. , 1967 .

[50]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .