Characterizing spacecraft potential effects on measured particle trajectories

As spacecraft does not have an independent method to conduct charge to ground, it naturally accumulates charge due to interactions with the ambient plasma and surface emission. This charge produces an electric field surrounding the spacecraft, which takes the form of a plasma sheath. Charged particles traveling through this sheath are altered in both energy and direction, thus affecting derived scientific quantities. While this effect has been known since the advent of space based particle instruments, this work represents the first time that an in situ characterization study of this effect has been possible. The Fast Plasma Investigation, of the Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, obtains near simultaneous measurements of phase space, via particle counts from 512 look directions and 32 energies. These new data allow the relative effects of the plasma sheath to be explored at a high time and spatial resolution. This work presents a method by which these measurements are used to study a ground model that traces the migration of particles through the sheath and estimates the error in measured velocity. This approach, performed statistically, leads to an estimation of uncertainty in particle count distributions for a given location in phase space and characterization of the redistribution of counts within a skymap due to sheath effects.As spacecraft does not have an independent method to conduct charge to ground, it naturally accumulates charge due to interactions with the ambient plasma and surface emission. This charge produces an electric field surrounding the spacecraft, which takes the form of a plasma sheath. Charged particles traveling through this sheath are altered in both energy and direction, thus affecting derived scientific quantities. While this effect has been known since the advent of space based particle instruments, this work represents the first time that an in situ characterization study of this effect has been possible. The Fast Plasma Investigation, of the Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, obtains near simultaneous measurements of phase space, via particle counts from 512 look directions and 32 energies. These new data allow the relative effects of the plasma sheath to be explored at a high time and spatial resolution. This work presents a method by which these measurements are used to study a ground model that tr...

[1]  C. Russell,et al.  Electron Crescent Distributions as a Manifestation of Diamagnetic Drift in an Electron‐Scale Current Sheet: Magnetospheric Multiscale Observations Using New 7.5 ms Fast Plasma Investigation Moments , 2017, Geophysical Research Letters.

[2]  U. Gliese,et al.  Spacecraft and Instrument Photoelectrons Measured by the Dual Electron Spectrometers on MMS , 2017 .

[3]  R. Marchand,et al.  Kinetic Simulation of Spacecraft–Environment Interaction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[4]  U. Gliese,et al.  Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale , 2016 .

[5]  Thomas E. Moore,et al.  Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives , 2016 .

[6]  Per-Arne Lindqvist,et al.  The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission , 2016 .

[7]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The Electron Drift Instrument for MMS , 2016 .

[8]  Rumi Nakamura,et al.  Active Spacecraft Potential Control Investigation , 2016 .

[9]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS , 2016 .

[10]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The FIELDS Instrument Suite on MMS: Scientific Objectives, Measurements, and Data Products , 2016 .

[11]  M. Horányi,et al.  Plasma potential in the sheaths of electron‐emitting surfaces in space , 2016 .

[12]  D. Gershman,et al.  The calculation of moment uncertainties from velocity distribution functions with random errors , 2015 .

[13]  C. Cully,et al.  Plasma particle simulations of wake formation behind a spacecraft with thin wire booms , 2013 .

[14]  P. Louarn,et al.  Simulation Study of Spacecraft Electrostatic Sheath Changes With the Heliocentric Distances From 0.044 to 1 AU , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[15]  Xu Wang,et al.  Experimental study of a photoelectron sheath , 2012 .

[16]  F. Mozer,et al.  Spacecraft charging and ion wake formation in the near-Sun environment , 2010, 1006.0760.

[17]  D. Payan,et al.  SPIS Open-Source Code: Methods, Capabilities, Achievements, and Prospects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[18]  A. Eriksson,et al.  Electrostatic structure around spacecraft in tenuous plasmas , 2007 .

[19]  A. Lichtenberg,et al.  Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing: Lieberman/Plasma 2e , 2005 .

[20]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A corrector for spacecraft calculated electron moments , 2005 .

[21]  V. Génot,et al.  Potential barrier in the electrostatic sheath around a magnetospheric spacecraft , 2004 .

[22]  C. Escoubet,et al.  The influence of the photosheath on the very low energy electrons during active potential control , 1998 .

[23]  J. Rouzaud,et al.  THE CLUSTER ION SPECTROMETRY (CIS) EXPERIMENT , 1997 .

[24]  J. Phillips,et al.  Effects of spacecraft potential on three-dimensional electron measurements in the solar wind , 1994 .

[25]  G. Paschmann,et al.  An instrument for rapidly measuring plasma distribution functions with high resolution , 1982 .

[26]  H. Garrett.  The charging of spacecraft surfaces , 1981 .

[27]  L. Parker,et al.  Theory of spacecraft sheath structure, potential, and velocity effects on ion measurements by traps and mass spectrometers , 1970 .