Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC: A Review of Developments since the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcano Ash Cloud

It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajokull caused unprecedented disruption to air traffic across Europe. During this event, the London Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC) provided advice and guidance on the expected location of volcanic ash in the atmosphere using observations and the atmospheric dispersion model NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-Dispersion Modelling Environment). Rapid changes in regulatory response and procedures during the eruption introduced the requirement to also provide forecasts of ash concentrations, representing a step-change in the level of interrogation of the dispersion model output. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. We present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned. Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep moist atmospheric convection and parametrizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Finally, upper air wind field data used by the dispersion model is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event.

[1]  F. Beckett,et al.  The Impact of Eruption Source Parameter Uncertainties on Ash Dispersion Forecasts During Explosive Volcanic Eruptions , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[2]  A. Rust,et al.  Estimating the 3D shape of volcanic ash to better understand sedimentation processes and improve atmospheric dispersion modelling , 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[3]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  Operational Modelling of Umbrella Cloud Growth in a Lagrangian Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion Model , 2020, Atmosphere.

[4]  F. Sigmundsson,et al.  Practising an explosive eruption in Iceland: outcomes from a European exercise , 2020, Journal of Applied Volcanology.

[5]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  The fate of volcanic ash aggregates: premature or delayed sedimentation? , 2020 .

[6]  A. Rust,et al.  The importance of grain size and shape in controlling the dispersion of the Vedde cryptotephra , 2019, Journal of Quaternary Science.

[7]  A. Rust,et al.  Far‐travelled ash in past and future eruptions: combining tephrochronology with volcanic studies , 2019, Journal of Quaternary Science.

[8]  M. Pavolonis,et al.  Globally detected volcanic lightning and umbrella dynamics during the 2014 eruption of Kelud, Indonesia , 2019, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[9]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  Reliability of Total Grain-Size Distribution of Tephra Deposits , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[10]  F. Prata,et al.  Passive Earth Observations of Volcanic Clouds in the Atmosphere , 2019, Atmosphere.

[11]  A. Guillin,et al.  Low efficiency of large volcanic eruptions in transporting very fine ash into the atmosphere , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[12]  G. Grell,et al.  The effects of simulating volcanic aerosol radiative feedbacks with WRF-Chem during the Eyjafjallajökull eruption, April and May 2010 , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[13]  Mohamed Zerroukat,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations , 2011, Geoscientific Model Development.

[14]  J. Ruiz,et al.  Volcanic ash forecast using ensemble-based data assimilation: the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter coupled with FALL3D-7.2 model (ETKF-FALL3D, version 1.0) , 2019 .

[15]  A. Prata,et al.  Calculating and communicating ensemble‐based volcanic ash dosage and concentration risk for aviation , 2018, Meteorological Applications.

[16]  A. Rust,et al.  The impact of particle shape on fall velocity: Implications for volcanic ash dispersion modelling , 2018, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[17]  Thomas R. Walter,et al.  REFIR- A multi-parameter system for near real-time estimates of plume-height and mass eruption rate during explosive eruptions , 2018, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[18]  Michele Prestifilippo,et al.  Mass Eruption Rates of Tephra Plumes During the 2011–2015 Lava Fountain Paroxysms at Mt. Etna From Doppler Radar Retrievals , 2018, Front. Earth Sci..

[19]  A. Jellinek,et al.  New insights on entrainment and condensation in volcanic plumes: Constraints from independent observations of explosive eruptions and implications for assessing their impacts , 2018 .

[20]  M. Zidikheri,et al.  Quantitative Verification and Calibration of Volcanic Ash Ensemble Forecasts Using Satellite Data , 2018 .

[21]  Parametrizing unresolved mesoscale motions in atmospheric dispersion models , 2018 .

[22]  E. Rossi.  A new perspective on volcanic particle sedimentation and aggregation , 2018 .

[23]  G. Carazzo,et al.  Turbulent Entrainment Into Volcanic Plumes: New Constraints From Laboratory Experiments on Buoyant Jets Rising in a Stratified Crossflow , 2017 .

[24]  Sophie Valcke,et al.  Crossing the chasm: how to develop weather and climate models for next generation computers? , 2017 .

[25]  G. Carazzo,et al.  A new analytical scaling for turbulent wind-bent plumes: Comparison of scaling laws with analog experiments and a new database of eruptive conditions for predicting the height of volcanic plumes , 2017 .

[26]  Toward quantitative forecasts of volcanic ash dispersal: Using satellite retrievals for optimal estimation of source terms , 2017 .

[27]  A. Folch,et al.  Volcanic ash modeling with the NMMB-MONARCH-ASH model: quantification of offline modeling errors , 2017 .

[28]  Sha Lu,et al.  Accelerating volcanic ash data assimilation using a mask-state algorithm based on an ensemble Kalman filter: A case study with the LOTOS-EUROS model (version 1.10) , 2017 .

[29]  T. Thordarson,et al.  The opening subplinian phase of the Hekla 1991 eruption: properties of the tephra fall deposit , 2017, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[30]  S. Carn,et al.  Atmospheric processes affecting the separation of volcanic ash and SO 2 in volcanic eruptions , 2017 .

[31]  Sha Lu,et al.  Data assimilation for volcanic ash plumes using a satellite observational operator: a case study on the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption , 2017 .

[32]  S. Scollo,et al.  Effect of particle volume fraction on the settling velocity of volcanic ash particles: insights from joint experimental and numerical simulations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[33]  S. Carn,et al.  (2017). Atmospheric processes affecting the separation of volcanic ash and SO2 in volcanic eruptions: Inferences from the May 2011 Grímsvötn eruption. , 2017 .

[34]  R. Clarkson,et al.  Maximising Airspace Use During Volcanic Eruptions: Matching Engine Durability against Ash Cloud Occurrence , 2017 .

[35]  Markus Gross,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations , 2017 .

[36]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Improving Model Simulations of Volcanic Emission Clouds and Assessing Model Uncertainties , 2016 .

[37]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  Timing and nature of volcanic particle clusters based on field and numerical investigations , 2016 .

[38]  B. Devenish,et al.  Estimating the total mass emitted by the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 using plume-rise models , 2016 .

[39]  A. Neri,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of gas–particle kinematic decoupling and turbulent entrainment in volcanic plumes , 2016 .

[40]  M. Woodhouse,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis of the PlumeRise model of volcanic plumes , 2016 .

[41]  Michael J. Pavolonis,et al.  Improving volcanic ash predictions with the HYSPLIT dispersion model by assimilating MODIS satellite retrievals , 2016 .

[42]  E. Watson,et al.  The transport of Icelandic volcanic ash: Insights from northern European cryptotephra records , 2016 .

[43]  Sha Lu,et al.  Estimation of volcanic ash emissions through assimilating satellite data and ground‐based observations , 2016 .

[44]  M. Pavolonis,et al.  Initializing HYSPLIT with satellite observations of volcanic ash: A case study of the 2008 Kasatochi eruption , 2016 .

[45]  David J. Thomson,et al.  Multi-level emulation of a volcanic ash transport and dispersion model to quantify sensitivity to uncertain parameters , 2016 .

[46]  Sha Lu,et al.  Model-based aviation advice on distal volcanic ash clouds byassimilating aircraft in situ measurements , 2016 .

[47]  A. Rust,et al.  Introduction: Part 2: Volcanic Ash: Generation and Spatial Variations , 2016 .

[48]  A. V. Van Eaton,et al.  Volcanic lightning and plume behavior reveal evolving hazards during the April 2015 eruption of Calbuco volcano, Chile , 2016 .

[49]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  Results of the eruptive column model inter-comparison study , 2016 .

[50]  Peter Mack,et al.  A re-evaluation of the 2010 quantitative understanding of the effects volcanic ash has on gas turbine engines , 2016 .

[51]  David J. Thomson,et al.  Using data insertion with the NAME model to simulate the 8 May 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash cloud , 2016 .

[52]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  Aerodynamics of Volcanic Particles: Characterization of Size, Shape, and Settling Velocity , 2016 .

[53]  R. Dare,et al.  Ensemble Prediction of the Dispersion of Volcanic Ash from the 13 February 2014 Eruption of Kelut, Indonesia , 2016 .

[54]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  Sensitivity of dispersion model forecasts of volcanic ash clouds to the physical characteristics of the particles , 2015 .

[55]  R. Büttner,et al.  Mass eruption rates in pulsating eruptions estimated from video analysis of the gas thrust-buoyancy transition—a case study of the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland , 2015, Earth, Planets and Space.

[56]  Arnau Folch,et al.  FPLUME-1.0: An integral volcanic plume model accounting for ash aggregation , 2015 .

[57]  Peter Bauer,et al.  The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , 2015, Nature.

[58]  L. Berselli,et al.  ASHEE: a compressible, equilibrium-Eulerian model for volcanic ash plumes , 2015, 1509.00093.

[59]  Sha Lu,et al.  Assimilating aircraft-based measurements to improve forecast accuracy of volcanic ash transport , 2015 .

[60]  Peter N. Francis,et al.  Uncertainty in two-channel infrared remote sensing retrievals of a well-characterised volcanic ash cloud , 2015, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[61]  Thorvaldur Thordarson,et al.  Big grains go far: understanding the discrepancy between tephrochronology and satellite infrared measurements of volcanic ash , 2015 .

[62]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  The role of gravitational instabilities in deposition of volcanic ash , 2015 .

[63]  F. Marenco,et al.  Volcanic ash layer depth: Processes and mechanisms , 2015 .

[64]  R. Sparks,et al.  Interpretation of umbrella cloud growth and morphology: implications for flow regimes of short-lived and long-lived eruptions , 2015, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[65]  E. R. Stefanescu,et al.  Temporal, probabilistic mapping of ash clouds using wind field stochastic variability and uncertain eruption source parameters: Example of the 14 April 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2014 .

[66]  D. Thomson,et al.  Towards a new scheme for parametrisation of deep convection in NAME III , 2014 .

[67]  Michael C. Cooke,et al.  Detection of the Grímsvötn 2011 volcanic eruption plumes using infrared satellite measurements , 2014 .

[68]  Puneet Singla,et al.  Computation of probabilistic hazard maps and source parameter estimation for volcanic ash transport and dispersion , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[69]  J. Lowenstern,et al.  Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption , 2014 .

[70]  M. Diamantakis,et al.  An inherently mass‐conserving semi‐implicit semi‐Lagrangian discretization of the deep‐atmosphere global non‐hydrostatic equations , 2014 .

[71]  Lieven Clarisse,et al.  Separation of ash and sulfur dioxide during the 2011 Grímsvötn eruption , 2014 .

[72]  Matteo Cerminara,et al.  Plume Ascent Tracker: Interactive Matlab software for analysis of ascending plumes in image data , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[73]  Marion Mittermaier,et al.  A Strategy for Verifying Near-Convection-Resolving Model Forecasts at Observing Sites , 2014 .

[74]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Volcanic ash infrared signature: porous non-spherical ash particle shapes compared to homogeneous spherical ash particles , 2014 .

[75]  D. Thomson,et al.  Data insertion in volcanic ash cloud forecasting , 2014 .

[76]  Arnau Folch,et al.  Density‐driven transport in the umbrella region of volcanic clouds: Implications for tephra dispersion models , 2013 .

[77]  A. Lorenc,et al.  Operational implementation of a hybrid ensemble/4D‐Var global data assimilation system at the Met Office , 2013 .

[78]  John C. Lin,et al.  Input Data Requirements for Lagrangian Trajectory Models , 2013 .

[79]  T. Thordarson,et al.  UK monitoring and deposition of tephra from the May 2011 eruption of Grímsvötn, Iceland , 2013, Journal of Applied Volcanology.

[80]  B. Devenish.  Using simple plume models to refine the source mass flux of volcanic eruptions according to atmospheric conditions , 2013 .

[81]  Eda Marchetti,et al.  Ash-plume dynamics and eruption source parameters by infrasound and thermal imagery: The 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2013 .

[82]  R. S. J. Sparks,et al.  Interaction between volcanic plumes and wind during the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, Iceland , 2013 .

[83]  B. Golding,et al.  Operational prediction of ash concentrations in the distal volcanic cloud from the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2012 .

[84]  Peter N. Francis,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of dispersion modeling of volcanic ash from Eyjafjallajökull in May 2010 , 2012 .

[85]  Franco Marenco,et al.  Performance assessment of a volcanic ash transport model mini-ensemble used for inverse modeling of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2012 .

[86]  U. Schumann,et al.  A case study of observations of volcanic ash from the Eyjafjallajökull eruption: 1. In situ airborne observations , 2012 .

[87]  Richard Cotton,et al.  In situ observations of volcanic ash clouds from the FAAM aircraft during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 , 2012 .

[88]  Pordur Arason,et al.  Two weather radar time series of the altitude of the volcanic plume during the May 2011 eruption of Grímsvötn, Iceland , 2012 .

[89]  E. E. Hughes,et al.  Impact of the Eyjafjallajökull ash cloud: A newspaper perspective , 2012 .

[90]  Thorvaldur Thordarson,et al.  Distal deposition of tephra from the Eyjafjallajökull 2010 summit eruption , 2012 .

[91]  Costanza Bonadonna,et al.  Improving on mass flow rate estimates of volcanic eruptions , 2012 .

[92]  Thorvaldur Thordarson,et al.  Ash generation and distribution from the April-May 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[93]  Roger P. Denlinger,et al.  A robust method to forecast volcanic ash clouds , 2012 .

[94]  Franco Marenco,et al.  A study of the arrival over the United Kingdom in April 2010 of the Eyjafjallajökull ash cloud using ground-based lidar and numerical simulations , 2012 .

[95]  Costanza Bonadonna,et al.  A review of volcanic ash aggregation , 2012 .

[96]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm Variational Approach to Data Assimilation and Application to Volcanic Emissions , 2012, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[97]  Tim Palmer,et al.  Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[98]  Maurizio Ripepe,et al.  Tephra sedimentation during the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption (Iceland) from deposit, radar, and satellite observations , 2011 .

[99]  A. Rust,et al.  Permeability controls on expansion and size distributions of pyroclasts , 2011 .

[100]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ash and fine-mode particle mass profiles from EARLINET-AERONET observations over central Europe after the eruptions of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in 2010 , 2011 .

[101]  Franco Marenco,et al.  Airborne lidar observations of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash plume , 2011 .

[102]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Evaluating the structure and magnitude of the ash plume during the initial phase of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption using lidar observations and NAME simulations , 2011 .

[103]  Pordur Arason,et al.  Observations of the altitude of the volcanic plume during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, April-May 2010 , 2011 .

[104]  W. Rose,et al.  Fate of volcanic ash: Aggregation and fallout , 2011 .

[105]  Kerstin Stebel,et al.  Determination of time- and height-resolved volcanic ash emissions and their use for quantitative ash dispersion modeling: the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2011 .

[106]  M. Hort,et al.  Volcanic ash hazard climatology for an eruption of Hekla Volcano, Iceland , 2011 .

[107]  Arnau Folch,et al.  Future developments in modelling and monitoring of volcanic ash clouds: outcomes from the first IAVCEI-WMO workshop on Ash Dispersal Forecast and Civil Aviation , 2011, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[108]  Arnau Folch,et al.  A model for wet aggregation of ash particles in volcanic plumes and clouds: 2. Model application , 2010 .

[109]  Arnau Folch,et al.  A model for wet aggregation of ash particles in volcanic plumes and clouds: 1. Theoretical formulation , 2010 .

[110]  D. Thomson,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a buoyant plume in uniform and stably stratified environments , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[111]  H. Webster,et al.  The Entrainment Rate for Buoyant Plumes in a Crossflow , 2010 .

[112]  Barbara J. B. Stunder,et al.  Preliminary sensitivity study of eruption source parameters for operational volcanic ash cloud transport and dispersion models — A case study of the August 1992 eruption of the Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr, Alaska , 2009 .

[113]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion during eruptions , 2009 .

[114]  William I. Rose,et al.  Fine ash content of explosive eruptions , 2009 .

[115]  M. Herzog,et al.  Tall clouds from small eruptions: the sensitivity of eruption height and fine ash content to tropospheric instability , 2009 .

[116]  Neill E. Bowler,et al.  The local ETKF and SKEB: Upgrades to the MOGREPS short‐range ensemble prediction system , 2009 .

[117]  D. Thomson,et al.  Dry deposition modelling in a Lagrangian dispersion model , 2008 .

[118]  Arnau Folch,et al.  A parametric and comparative study of different tephra fallout models , 2008 .

[119]  Neill E. Bowler,et al.  The MOGREPS short‐range ensemble prediction system , 2008 .

[120]  F. Bonnardot,et al.  Comparison of VAAC atmospheric dispersion models using the 1 November 2004 Grimsvötn eruption , 2007 .

[121]  David J. Thomson,et al.  The U.K. Met Office's Next-Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Model, NAME III , 2007 .

[122]  A. Lorenc,et al.  The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2007 .

[123]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  Establishing Moore's Law , 2006, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[124]  Costanza Bonadonna,et al.  Total grain-size distribution and volume of tephra-fall deposits , 2005 .

[125]  William I. Rose,et al.  Integrating retrievals of volcanic cloud characteristics from satellite remote sensors: a summary , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[126]  T. Papanastasiou,et al.  Viscous Fluid Flow , 1999 .

[127]  C. Newhall,et al.  Fire and mud: eruptions and lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines , 1998 .

[128]  B. Stunder,et al.  Volcanic ash forecast transport and dispersion (VAFTAD) model , 1993 .

[129]  Gary H. Ganser,et al.  A rational approach to drag prediction of spherical and nonspherical particles , 1993 .

[130]  M. Hilton,et al.  The aerodynamic behaviour of volcanic aggregates , 1993 .

[131]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  Airborne measurements of particle and gas emissions from the 1990 volcanic eruptions of Mount Redoubt , 1991 .

[132]  Haraldur Sigurdsson,et al.  Influence of particle aggregation on deposition of distal tephra from the MAy 18, 1980, eruption of Mount St. Helens volcano , 1982 .

[133]  R. K. Sorem.  Volcanic ash clusters: Tephra rafts and scavengers , 1982 .

[134]  E. Lorenz.  Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[135]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.