Identifying Purkinje cells using only their spontaneous simple spike activity

BACKGROUND We have extended our cerebellar cortical interneuron classification algorithm that uses statistics of spontaneous activity (Ruigrok et al., 2011) to include Purkinje cells. Purkinje cells were added because they do not always show a detectable complex spike, which is the accepted identification. The statistical measures used in the present study were obtained from morphologically identified interneurons and complex spike identified Purkinje cells, recorded from ketamine-xylazine anesthetized rats and rabbits, and from awake rabbits. NEW METHOD The new algorithm has an added decision step that classifies Purkinje cells using a combination of the median absolute difference from the median interspike interval (MAD) and the mean of the relative differences of successive interspike intervals (CV2). These measures reflect the high firing rate and intermediate regularity of Purkinje cell simple spike activity. RESULTS Of 86 juxtacellularly labeled interneurons and 110 complex spike-identified Purkinje cells, 61 interneurons and 95 Purkinje cells were correctly classified, 22 interneurons and 13 Purkinje cells were deemed unclassifiable, and 3 interneurons and 2 Purkinje cells were incorrectly classified. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS The new algorithm improves on our previous algorithm because it includes Purkinje cells. This algorithm is the only one for the cerebellum that does not presume anatomical knowledge of whether the cells are in the molecular layer or the granular layer. CONCLUSIONS These results strengthen the view that the new decision algorithm is useful for identifying neurons recorded at all cerebellar depths, particularly those neurons recorded in the rabbit vestibulocerebellum.

[1]  N. Barmack,et al.  Functions of Interneurons in Mouse Cerebellum , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Simpson,et al.  Phase relations of Purkinje cells in the rabbit flocculus during compensatory eye movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Houk,et al.  Movement-related inputs to intermediate cerebellum of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Simpson,et al.  Climbing fiber responses evoked in vestibulocerebellum of rabbit from visual system. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  James M. Bower,et al.  Tactile Responses in the Granule Cell Layer of Cerebellar Folium Crus IIa of Freely Behaving Rats , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Tahl Holtzman,et al.  Different responses of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells and Golgi cells evoked by widespread convergent sensory inputs , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. A. Hensbroek,et al.  Spontaneous Activity Signatures of Morphologically Identified Interneurons in the Vestibulocerebellum , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  R. A. Hensbroek,et al.  Intraburst and Interburst Signaling by Climbing Fibers , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Eccles,et al.  The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  E De Schutter,et al.  Cerebellar Golgi cells in the rat: receptive fields and timing of responses to facial stimulation , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality , 1990 .

[13]  J. Bower,et al.  Feedforward inhibition controls the spread of granule cell-induced Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Receptive Field Plasticity Profoundly Alters the Cutaneous Parallel Fiber Synaptic Input to Cerebellar Interneurons In Vivo , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  H. C. Hulscher,et al.  Between in and out: linking morphology and physiology of cerebellar cortical interneurons. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[16]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes acting upon individual Purkinje cells of the cerebellum in cats , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  William R. Softky,et al.  Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M Lidierth,et al.  The discharges of cerebellar Golgi cells during locomotion in the cat. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Shane A. Heiney,et al.  Probabilistic Identification of Cerebellar Cortical Neurones across Species , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  W. Hevers,et al.  Ketamine, But Not Phencyclidine, Selectively Modulates Cerebellar GABAA Receptors Containing α6 and δ Subunits , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.