Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation.

Separation is a potential risk when using any instrument in the root canal system. Presently, there are no large clinical studies investigating the separation incidence of the ProTaper rotary file system or the number of times a ProTaper rotary file can be safely used. The purpose of this study was to determine if the number of uses affects the separation incidence of ProTaper rotary instruments. 4652 consecutively treated root canals were performed in an endodontic group practice over a 17-month period. Both the separation incidence and the number of uses were tracked for each file. The overall rate of instrument fracture in this study was 2.4% with no significant differences over the first four uses. The results of this study indicate that ProTaper rotary files may be safely reused at least four times. The size of the rotary file, among other factors, will determine how many times a particular file should be used.

[1]  L Bergmans,et al.  Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[2]  J Y Blum,et al.  Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using Profile NiTi rotary instruments. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[3]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  V T Himel,et al.  Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  B. Sattapan,et al.  Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  G. Cheung,et al.  Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  V. Buono,et al.  Surface analysis of ProFile instruments by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy: a preliminary study. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[8]  Geoff Bateman,et al.  Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 1999 .

[9]  F. Barbakow,et al.  The 'Lightspeed' preparation technique evaluated by Swiss clinicians after attending continuing education courses. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[10]  John C. Mitchell,et al.  Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  G. Kuhn,et al.  Fatigue and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  P Machtou,et al.  Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[13]  J B Roane,et al.  The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  A. Saxena,et al.  Nickel-titanium instruments : applications in endodontics , 1995 .

[15]  Gary R Hartwell,et al.  K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  J Y Blum,et al.  Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  T. Sotokawa.  An analysis of clinical breakage of root canal instruments. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  J. Silvaggio,et al.  Effect of heat sterilization on the torsional properties of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic files. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  D. Daugherty,et al.  Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  G. Cantatore,et al.  The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  Walton Re,et al.  Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. , 1997 .

[22]  G Gambarini,et al.  Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[23]  J. P. Pruett,et al.  Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.