Triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with multi-constellation GNSS: BDS and Galileo

Multi-constellation GNSS (multi-GNSS) and multi-frequency signals open new prospects for fast ambiguity resolution (AR) of precise point positioning (PPP). Currently, all the BDS and Galileo satellites are capable of transmitting signals on three or more frequencies. In this contribution, we investigate the triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with B1, B2 and B3 observations from BDS satellites and E1, E5a and E5b observations from Galileo satellites and evaluate the contribution of BDS + Galileo combination to triple-frequency PPP AR. The uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) products are estimated based on triple-frequency observations, and the temporal characteristic as well as the residual distributions are analyzed. Our results show that the extra-wide-lane (EWL) and wide-lane (WL) UPDs for BDS and Galileo satellites are both stable during the 30 days and the daily narrow-lane (NL) UPD series are also steady with no obvious fluctuation. The Galileo UPDs exhibit better performance than BDS UPDs due to the high-quality observations. It is also interesting to find that the EWL UPD corrections for all Galileo satellites are very close to the zero. With the precise UPD products, the triple-frequency PPP AR with BDS and Galileo observations was implemented in both static and kinematic modes. Compared to the ambiguity-float solution, the performance can be significantly improved by triple-frequency PPP AR with the positioning accuracy improved by 30–70% in both static and kinematic modes. Moreover, the triple-frequency PPP fixed solutions also present better performance than the dual-frequency PPP fixed solutions in terms of time to the first fix and positioning accuracy, especially for the Galileo-only and BDS + Galileo solutions. And the fusion of multi-GNSS (BDS and Galileo) can further improve the position estimations compared to the single system with more satellites and better spatial geometry.

[1]  Y. Bock,et al.  Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California , 1989 .

[2]  P. Teunissen The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation , 1995 .

[3]  Shaowei Han,et al.  Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning , 1996 .

[4]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[5]  Pierre Héroux,et al.  Precise Point Positioning Using IGS Orbit and Clock Products , 2001, GPS Solutions.

[6]  J. Kouba A GUIDE TO USING INTERNATIONAL GNSS SERVICE (IGS) PRODUCTS , 2003 .

[7]  J.-P. Berthias,et al.  Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination , 2007 .

[8]  Liu Jing-nan,et al.  PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination , 2003, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[9]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[10]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Three's the challenge: A close look at GPS SVN62 triple-frequency signal combinations finds carrier-phase variations on the new L5 , 2010 .

[11]  Bofeng Li,et al.  Wide area real time kinematic decimetre positioning with multiple carrier GNSS signals , 2010 .

[12]  Haojun Li,et al.  Fast estimation and analysis of the inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[13]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Improving the Estimation of Uncalibrated Fractional Phase Offsets for PPP Ambiguity Resolution , 2012 .

[14]  Maorong Ge,et al.  A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[15]  Y. Bock,et al.  Triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning with rapid ambiguity resolution , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[16]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  IGS-MGEX: Preparing the Ground for Multi-Constellation GNSS Science , 2013 .

[17]  Lambert Wanninger,et al.  BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy , 2015, GPS Solutions.

[18]  Yidong Lou,et al.  BeiDou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[19]  Mohamed Elsobeiey,et al.  Precise Point Positioning using Triple-Frequency GPS Measurements , 2015 .

[20]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[21]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[22]  Jingnan Liu,et al.  Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning , 2017, GPS Solutions.

[23]  Guo Fei,et al.  Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[24]  Jiayi Zhang,et al.  ACE-BOC: dual-frequency constant envelope multiplexing for satellite navigation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[25]  Cuixian Lu,et al.  Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[26]  Xin Li,et al.  Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[27]  Harald Schuh,et al.  Three-frequency BDS precise point positioning ambiguity resolution based on raw observables , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[28]  A. El-Mowafy,et al.  Triple-frequency GNSS models for PPP with float ambiguity estimation: performance comparison using GPS , 2018 .