TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila

Drosophila chromosomes are organized in a series of nanocompartments that correspond to topologically associating domains. Deciphering the rules of genome folding in the cell nucleus is essential to understand its functions. Recent chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) studies have revealed that the genome is partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs), which demarcate functional epigenetic domains defined by combinations of specific chromatin marks. However, whether TADs are true physical units in each cell nucleus or whether they reflect statistical frequencies of measured interactions within cell populations is unclear. Using a combination of Hi-C, three-dimensional (3D) fluorescent in situ hybridization, super-resolution microscopy, and polymer modeling, we provide an integrative view of chromatin folding in Drosophila. We observed that repressed TADs form a succession of discrete nanocompartments, interspersed by less condensed active regions. Single-cell analysis revealed a consistent TAD-based physical compartmentalization of the chromatin fiber, with some degree of heterogeneity in intra-TAD conformations and in cis and trans inter-TAD contact events. These results indicate that TADs are fundamental 3D genome units that engage in dynamic higher-order inter-TAD connections. This domain-based architecture is likely to play a major role in regulatory transactions during DNA-dependent processes.

[1]  A. Tanay,et al.  Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development , 2017, Cell.

[2]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains , 2017, Cell.

[3]  Nuno A. Fonseca,et al.  Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal , 2017, Nature.

[4]  Yijun Ruan,et al.  Evolutionarily Conserved Principles Predict 3D Chromatin Organization. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[5]  M. Tomita,et al.  Dynamic organization of chromatin domains revealed by super-resolution live-cell imaging , 2017 .

[6]  M. Martí-Renom,et al.  Single-cell absolute contact probability detection reveals chromosomes are organized by multiple low-frequency yet specific interactions , 2017, Nature Communications.

[7]  L. Mirny,et al.  Targeted Degradation of CTCF Decouples Local Insulation of Chromosome Domains from Genomic Compartmentalization , 2017, Cell.

[8]  Peter H. L. Krijger,et al.  The Cohesin Release Factor WAPL Restricts Chromatin Loop Extension , 2017, Cell.

[9]  Atsushi Matsuda,et al.  Strategic and practical guidelines for successful structured illumination microscopy , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[10]  Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al.  Chromatin Architecture Emerges during Zygotic Genome Activation Independent of Transcription , 2017, Cell.

[11]  Ilya M. Flyamer,et al.  Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition , 2017, Nature.

[12]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes , 2017, Genome research.

[13]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Cell cycle dynamics of chromosomal organisation at single-cell resolution , 2016 .

[14]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3D genome , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  D. Jost,et al.  The folding landscape of the epigenome , 2016, Physical biology.

[16]  Patrick Schorderet,et al.  Chromatin topology is coupled to Polycomb group protein subnuclear organization , 2016, Nature Communications.

[17]  Ilya M. Flyamer,et al.  Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains , 2016, Genome research.

[18]  Leonid A. Mirny,et al.  Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states , 2015, Nature.

[19]  Roger D. Kornberg,et al.  Stable Chromosome Condensation Revealed by Chromosome Conformation Capture , 2015, Cell.

[20]  Ian M. Dobbie,et al.  SIMcheck: a Toolbox for Successful Super-resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2015, Cell.

[22]  A. Visel,et al.  Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[23]  Peng Yin,et al.  Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes , 2015, Nature Communications.

[24]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Topology, structures, and energy landscapes of human chromosomes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Cell cycle staging of individual cells by fluorescence microscopy , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[26]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[27]  Robert S Illingworth,et al.  Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2014, Genes & development.

[28]  Amos Tanay,et al.  Cooperativity, specificity, and evolutionary stability of Polycomb targeting in Drosophila. , 2014, Cell reports.

[29]  J. Dekker,et al.  Predictive Polymer Modeling Reveals Coupled Fluctuations in Chromosome Conformation and Transcription , 2014, Cell.

[30]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Topological organization of Drosophila Hox genes using DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  Alessandro Valeri,et al.  Super-Resolution Imaging of Bacteria in a Microfluidics Device , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  A. Tanay,et al.  Single cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure , 2013, Nature.

[33]  E. Margeat,et al.  Recruitment, Assembly, and Molecular Architecture of the SpoIIIE DNA Pump Revealed by Superresolution Microscopy , 2013, PLoS biology.

[34]  Judith K. Brown,et al.  Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates. , 2013, Advances in genetics.

[35]  Zhaohui S. Qin,et al.  Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[36]  J. Sedat,et al.  Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre , 2012, Nature.

[37]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  The potential of 3D‐FISH and super‐resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[38]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[39]  A. Tanay,et al.  Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.

[40]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[41]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[42]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[44]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The three postblastoderm cell cycles of Drosophila embryogenesis are regulated in G2 by string , 1990, Cell.

[45]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3 D genome , 2022 .