Creating and supporting a mixed methods health services research team.

OBJECTIVE To use the experience from a health services research evaluation to provide guidance in team development for mixed methods research. METHODS The Research Initiative Valuing Eldercare (THRIVE) team was organized by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to evaluate The Green House nursing home culture change program. This article describes the development of the research team and provides insights into how funders might engage with mixed methods research teams to maximize the value of the team. RESULTS Like many mixed methods collaborations, the THRIVE team consisted of researchers from diverse disciplines, embracing diverse methodologies, and operating under a framework of nonhierarchical, shared leadership that required new collaborations, engagement, and commitment in the context of finite resources. Strategies to overcome these potential obstacles and achieve success included implementation of a Coordinating Center, dedicated time for planning and collaborating across researchers and methodologies, funded support for in-person meetings, and creative optimization of resources. CONCLUSIONS Challenges are inevitably present in the formation and operation of effective mixed methods research teams. However, funders and research teams can implement strategies to promote success.

[1]  John Creswell,et al.  The Use of “Mixing” Procedure of Mixed Methods in Health Services Research , 2013, Medical care.

[2]  E. Piggot-Irvine,et al.  The Application of a Multiphase Triangulation Approach to Mixed Methods , 2012 .

[3]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. , 2012, Health services research.

[4]  Larry R Hearld,et al.  Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-system research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[5]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  Triangulation 2.0 * , 2012 .

[6]  Harry Torrance Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research , 2012 .

[7]  Catherine Mobley,et al.  A Mixed Methods Sampling Methodology for a Multisite Case Study , 2012 .

[8]  Michael D. Fetters,et al.  The Role of Group Dynamics in Mixed Methods Health Sciences Research Teams , 2012 .

[9]  M. Bergman The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Mixed Methods Research and Design , 2011 .

[10]  Michael D Fetters,et al.  RO1 Funding for Mixed Methods Research , 2011, Journal of mixed methods research.

[11]  J. Creswell,et al.  Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in Health Sciences: (566732013-001) , 2011 .

[12]  Lauren W. Cohen,et al.  Evidence behind The Green House and similar models of nursing home care , 2010 .

[13]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses , 2010, Journal of mixed methods research.

[14]  Manfred Max Bergman,et al.  On Concepts and Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research , 2010 .

[15]  Pam Sammons The Contribution of Mixed Methods to Recent Research on Educational Effectiveness , 2010 .

[16]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[17]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Editorial: Integrating Data Analyses in Mixed Methods Research , 2009 .

[18]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research , 2009, Circulation.

[19]  Alicia O’Cathain,et al.  Editorial: Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences: A Quiet Revolution , 2009 .

[20]  Kirsten Howard,et al.  A Synergistic Approach , 2008 .

[21]  Pia Russell,et al.  Integrative Mixed Methods Data Analytic Strategies in Research on School Success in Challenging Circumstances , 2008 .

[22]  J. Greene Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? , 2008 .

[23]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[24]  Leslie Goodyear,et al.  The Merits of Mixing Methods in Evaluation , 2001 .