Two-stage make-to-order remanufacturing with service-level constraints

We consider a firm that meets demand for an order with remanufactured products, new products or a mix of both. There are constraints on the service level. We use a stylized two-stage GI/G/ 1 queuing network model to study the problem. The first stage is unique to each product, whereas remanufactured and new products share the second stage. The objective was to find the optimal, long run production mix that maximizes profit subject to a service-level constraint that restricts the average order lead-time. There is yield in the remanufacturing process, where yield is the per cent of returned used products that result in a good part after remanufacturing. In the analytic model, we make the simplifying assumption that the producer always gets enough return of used products to meet its remanufacturing needs in the production mix. However, we relax this assumption in a simulation. We find that the optimal solution is generally non-trivial, i.e. the firm generally uses a mix of remanufactured and new products to meet demand. When the new product is less profitable than the remanufactured product, then it is optimal to remanufacture 100%, provided that there is enough supply of used products. When the new product is more profitable, however, the proportion of remanufacturing increases as service level increases. We use simulation to test the robustness of the analytic model by including complexities such as stochastic product returns and stochastic production yield.

[1]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Production planning and control for remanufacturing: a state - of - the - art survey , 1999 .

[2]  V D R Guide,et al.  Buffering from material recovery uncertainty in a recoverable manufacturing environment , 1997 .

[3]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time s, Q Inventory Models , 1991 .

[4]  Rajesh Srivastava,et al.  Inventory buffers in recoverable manufacturing , 1998 .

[5]  Erwin van der Laan,et al.  Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review , 1997 .

[6]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing , 1999 .

[7]  Suresh Kumar Goyal,et al.  Reducing Inventory Costs and Choosing Suppliers with Order Splitting , 1993 .

[8]  E. Silver,et al.  Safety stock reduction by order splitting , 1990 .

[9]  T. Speh,et al.  Remarketing: Commercialization of Remanufacturing Technology , 1991 .

[10]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Evaluating focused factory benefits with queuing theory , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Note: Dual sourcing with nonidentical suppliers , 1993 .

[12]  Rajesh Srivastava,et al.  Scheduling policies for remanufacturing , 1997 .

[13]  Marc Salomon,et al.  Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management , 1995 .

[14]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Effective Inventory and Service Management Through Product and Process Redesign , 1996, Oper. Res..

[15]  Hon-Shiang Lau,et al.  Optimal ordering policies with two suppliers when lead times and demands are all stochastic , 1993 .

[16]  John A. Buzacott,et al.  Stochastic models of manufacturing systems , 1993 .

[17]  Reinaldo Morabito,et al.  OPEN QUEUEING NETWORKS: OPTIMIZATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODELS FOR DISCRETE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS * , 2009 .

[18]  Upendra Dave,et al.  Heuristic Scheduling Systems , 1993 .

[19]  V. Guide Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs , 2000 .

[20]  Rajesh Srivastava,et al.  Product structure complexity and scheduling of operations in recoverable manufacturing , 1997 .

[21]  Z. K. Weng,et al.  Manufacturing lead times, system utilization rates and lead-time-related demand , 1996 .