Endoscopic and biopsy diagnoses of superficial, nonampullary, duodenal adenocarcinomas.

AIM To investigate the accuracy of endoscopic or biopsy diagnoses of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs). METHODS Clinicopathological data were reviewed for 84 superficial NADETs from 74 patients who underwent surgery or endoscopic resection between September 2002 and August 2014 at a single prefectural cancer center. Superficial NADETs were defined as lesions confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Demographic and clinicopathological data were retrieved from charts, endoscopic and pathologic reports. Endoscopic reports included endoscopic diagnosis, location, gross type, diameter, color, and presence or absence of biopsy. Endoscopic diagnoses were made by an endoscopist in charge of the examination before biopsy specimens were obtained. Endoscopic images were obtained using routine, front-view, high-resolution video endoscopy, and chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine was performed for all lesions. Endoscopic images were reviewed by at least two endoscopists to assess endoscopic findings indicative of carcinoma. Preoperative diagnoses based on endoscopy and biopsy findings were compared with histological diagnoses of resected specimens. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed for endoscopic diagnosis and biopsy diagnosis. RESULTS The majority (81%) of the lesions were located in the second portion of the duodenum. The median lesion diameter was 14.5 mm according to final histology. Surgery was performed for 49 lesions from 39 patients, and 35 lesions from 35 patients were endoscopically resected. Final histology confirmed 65 carcinomas, 15 adenomas, and 3 hyperplasias. A final diagnosis of duodenal carcinoma was made for 91% (52/57) of the lesions diagnosed as carcinoma by endoscopy and 93% (42/45) of the lesions diagnosed as carcinoma by biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of endoscopic diagnoses were 80%, 72%, and 78%, respectively, whereas those of biopsy diagnoses were 72%, 80%, and 74%, respectively. Preoperative diagnoses of carcinomas were made in 88% (57/65) of the carcinoma lesions via endoscopy or biopsy. Endoscopic findings associated with carcinoma were red color, depression, and mixed-type morphology. CONCLUSION Preoperative endoscopy and biopsy showed similar accuracies in the diagnosis of carcinoma in patients with superficial NADETs.

[1]  H. Ono,et al.  Method and timing of resection of superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors , 2014, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[2]  K. Goda,et al.  Endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in Japan: Multicenter case series , 2014, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[3]  S. E. Bae,et al.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas , 2013, Endoscopy.

[4]  S. Matsumoto,et al.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors: a single-center experience , 2012, Endoscopy.

[5]  A. Nakajima,et al.  Sporadic Nonampullary Duodenal Adenoma in the Natural History of Duodenal Cancer: A Study of Follow-up Surveillance , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  H. Ono,et al.  Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens , 2011, Gastric Cancer.

[7]  T. Sugai,et al.  USEFULNESS OF ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR DUODENAL ADENOMA , 2010, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[8]  H. Tajiri,et al.  Endoscopic features of nonampullary duodenal tumors with narrow-band imaging. , 2010, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[9]  T. Omori,et al.  Borderline cases between benignancy and malignancy of the duodenum diagnosed successfully by endoscopic submucosal dissection , 2009, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  M. Bourke,et al.  EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[11]  T. Ponchon,et al.  Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: an efficient technique with a substantial risk of delayed bleeding. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[12]  M. Mori,et al.  Magnifying endoscopic findings of early duodenal adenocarcinoma in relation to the pathological findings. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[13]  P. Møller,et al.  Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) , 2008, Gut.

[14]  I. Imoto,et al.  Depressed-type early duodenal carcinoma (carcinoma in situ) observed by enhanced magnification endoscopy. , 2007, Endoscopy.

[15]  K. Hess,et al.  Primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: Management and survival in 67 patients , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  K. Chayama,et al.  Clinicopathologic Features and Endoscopic Resection of Early Primary Nonampullary Duodenal Carcinoma , 2003, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[17]  M. Dixon Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited , 2002, Gut.

[18]  H. Iishi,et al.  Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic resection of duodenal adenocarcinomas and adenomas with the submucosal saline injection technique. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  E. Santoro,et al.  Primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: treatment and survival in 89 patients. , 1997, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[20]  K. Nagatani Indications for endoscopic treatment of early duodenal cancer : based on cases reported in the literature , 1993 .

[21]  F. Konishi,et al.  CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF DUODENAL ADENOMA , 1987 .

[22]  M. Kawamura,et al.  A CASE OF EARLY DUODENAL CANCER , 1983 .

[23]  K. H. Perzin,et al.  Adenomas of the small intestine: A clinicopathologic review of 51 cases and a study of their relationship to carcinoma , 1981, Cancer.

[24]  H. Fukutomi [Endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer]. , 1967, Iryo.

[25]  W. Fenwick,et al.  Primary Carcinoma of the Duodenum , 1901, Edinburgh Medical Journal.