Factors underlying restricted crossover localization in barley meiosis.

Meiotic recombination results in the formation of cytological structures known as chiasmata at the sites of genetic crossovers (COs). The formation of at least one chiasma/CO between homologous chromosome pairs is essential for accurate chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division as well as for generating genetic variation. Although DNA double-strand breaks, which initiate recombination, are widely distributed along the chromosomes, this is not necessarily reflected in the chiasma distribution. In many species there is a tendency for chiasmata to be distributed in favored regions along the chromosomes, whereas in others, such as barley and some other grasses, chiasma localization is extremely pronounced. Localization of chiasma to the distal regions of barley chromosomes restricts the genetic variation available to breeders. Studies reviewed herein are beginning to provide an explanation for chiasma localization in barley. Moreover, they suggest a potential route to manipulating chiasma distribution that could be of value to plant breeders.

[1]  I. Colas,et al.  The Synaptonemal Complex Protein ZYP1 Is Required for Imposition of Meiotic Crossovers in Barley[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[2]  Changyin Wu,et al.  Replication Protein A2c Coupled with Replication Protein A1c Regulates Crossover Formation during Meiosis in Rice[C][W][OPEN] , 2013, Plant Cell.

[3]  Thomas J. Hardcastle,et al.  Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hotspots overlap with H2A.Z nucleosomes at gene promoters , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[4]  F. Wright,et al.  Quantitative high resolution mapping of HvMLH3 foci in barley pachytene nuclei reveals a strong distal bias and weak interference , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  Mihaela M. Martis,et al.  A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. , 2022 .

[6]  Robbie Waugh,et al.  Spatiotemporal Asymmetry of the Meiotic Program Underlies the Predominantly Distal Distribution of Meiotic Crossovers in Barley[W] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[7]  C. Nibau,et al.  High Resolution Analysis of Meiotic Chromosome Structure and Behaviour in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  G. Copenhaver,et al.  FANCM Limits Meiotic Crossovers , 2012, Science.

[9]  J. Higgins,et al.  The Fanconi Anemia Ortholog FANCM Ensures Ordered Homologous Recombination in Both Somatic and Meiotic Cells in Arabidopsis[W] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[10]  K. Mechtler,et al.  Inter-Homolog Crossing-Over and Synapsis in Arabidopsis Meiosis Are Dependent on the Chromosome Axis Protein AtASY3 , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[11]  A. Lukaszewski,et al.  Inversions of chromosome arms 4AL and 2BS in wheat invert the patterns of chiasma distribution , 2011, Chromosoma.

[12]  E. Sanchez-Moran,et al.  Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[13]  Kevin Brick,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots , 2011, Nature.

[14]  Ivan V. Gregoretti,et al.  Genome‐wide Analysis Reveals Novel Molecular Features of Mouse Recombination , 2011 .

[15]  Xuan Zhu,et al.  A Hierarchical Combination of Factors Shapes the Genome-wide Topography of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Initiation , 2011, Cell.

[16]  F. Berger,et al.  Retinoblastoma protein is essential for early meiotic events in Arabidopsis , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Olivier C. Martin,et al.  CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Zhukuan Cheng,et al.  PAIR3, an axis-associated protein, is essential for the recruitment of recombination elements onto meiotic chromosomes in rice , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  L. Chelysheva,et al.  An Easy Protocol for Studying Chromatin and Recombination Protein Dynamics during Arabidopsisthaliana Meiosis: Immunodetection of Cohesins, Histones and MLH1 , 2010, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[20]  T. Naranjo,et al.  Chiasma Frequency Is Region Specific and Chromosome Conformation Dependent in a Rye Chromosome Added to Wheat , 2010, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[21]  W. Pawlowski,et al.  Chromosome Dynamics in Meiotic Prophase I in Plants , 2010, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[22]  Luke E. Berchowitz,et al.  Genetic Interference: Don’t Stand So Close to Me , 2010, Current genomics.

[23]  A. Errico,et al.  Histone hyperacetylation affects meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Arabidopsis. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[24]  K. Paigen,et al.  Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  K. Paigen,et al.  Prdm9 Controls Activation of Mammalian Recombination Hotspots , 2010, Science.

[26]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Drive Against Hotspot Motifs in Primates Implicates the PRDM9 Gene in Meiotic Recombination , 2010, Science.

[27]  G. Coop,et al.  PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice , 2010, Science.

[28]  Zhukuan Cheng,et al.  The Central Element Protein ZEP1 of the Synaptonemal Complex Regulates the Number of Crossovers during Meiosis in Rice[C][W][OA] , 2010, Plant Cell.

[29]  Matthieu Falque,et al.  Two Types of Meiotic Crossovers Coexist in Maize[W] , 2009, The Plant Cell Online.

[30]  Qifa Zhang,et al.  Mutation of the rice gene PAIR3 results in lack of bivalent formation in meiosis. , 2009, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[31]  A. Lima-de-faria,et al.  The relation between the chromosome size gradient and the sequence of DNA replication in rye , 2009 .

[32]  M. Hultén Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. , 2009, Hereditas.

[33]  Alain Nicolas,et al.  Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[34]  A. Lukaszewski Unexpected behavior of an inverted rye chromosome arm in wheat , 2008, Chromosoma.

[35]  J. Higgins,et al.  AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis. , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[36]  M. Grelon,et al.  Meiosis in plants: ten years of gene discovery , 2008, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[37]  C. Heyting,et al.  The Mismatch Repair Protein MLH1 Marks a Subset of Strongly Interfering Crossovers in Tomato[W][OA] , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[38]  C. Heyting,et al.  Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[39]  F. C. H. Franklin,et al.  Meiotic Crossing-over: Obligation and Interference , 2006, Cell.

[40]  Andreas Houben,et al.  Chromosomal histone modification patterns--from conservation to diversity. , 2006, Trends in plant science.

[41]  N. Kleckner Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex , 2006, Chromosoma.

[42]  E. Sanchez-Moran,et al.  Reduced meiotic crossovers and delayed prophase I progression in AtMLH3‐deficient Arabidopsis , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[43]  J. Lieb,et al.  Global Analysis of the Relationship between the Binding of the Bas1p Transcription Factor and Meiosis-Specific Double-Strand DNA Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[44]  N. Kurata,et al.  PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis I , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  E. Sanchez-Moran,et al.  The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over. , 2005, Genes & development.

[46]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Comparative physical mapping links conservation of microsynteny to chromosome structure and recombination in grasses. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  M. T. Parra,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks and homology search: inferences from a species with incomplete pairing and synapsis , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[48]  M. Doutriaux,et al.  Two Meiotic Crossover Classes Cohabit in Arabidopsis One Is Dependent on MER3,whereas the Other One Is Not , 2005, Current Biology.

[49]  J. Higgins,et al.  The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. , 2004, Genes & development.

[50]  R. Hawley,et al.  The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. , 2004, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[51]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  A mechanical basis for chromosome function. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  L. Harper,et al.  A bouquet of chromosomes , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[53]  D. Zickler,et al.  Early Decision Meiotic Crossover Interference prior to Stable Strand Exchange and Synapsis , 2004, Cell.

[54]  G. Roeder,et al.  Imposition of Crossover Interference through the Nonrandom Distribution of Synapsis Initiation Complexes , 2004, Cell.

[55]  E. Marcon,et al.  MLH1p and MLH3p localize to precociously induced chiasmata of okadaic-acid-treated mouse spermatocytes. , 2003, Genetics.

[56]  L. Anderson,et al.  High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules. , 2003, Genetics.

[57]  Junhua Peng,et al.  Synteny perturbations between wheat homoeologous chromosomes caused by locus duplications and deletions correlate with recombination rates , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  F. Franklin,et al.  A meiotic time-course for Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[59]  R. Waugh,et al.  Integration of microsatellite markers into the translocation-based physical RFLP map of barley chromosome 3H , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[60]  J. Draper,et al.  Brachypodium distachyon. A new model system for functional genomics in grasses. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[61]  Harry Scherthan,et al.  A bouquet makes ends meet , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[62]  M. S. Pagliarini,et al.  Meiotic Behavior in Several Brazilian Oat Cultivars (Avena sativa L.) , 2000 .

[63]  J. Doebley,et al.  Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. , 1999, Genetics.

[64]  E. Kellogg Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  P. Colombo,et al.  Chiasma interference is blind to centromeres1 , 1997, Heredity.

[66]  P. Colombo,et al.  Chiasma interference is blind to centromeres**This paper is dedicated to Professor Dr J. H. Hunziker on the occasion of his 70th birthday. , 1997 .

[67]  S. Keeney,et al.  Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family , 1997, Cell.

[68]  A. Lukaszewski,et al.  Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[69]  A. Lukaszewski A comparison of physical distribution of recombination in chromosome 1R in diploid rye and in hexaploid triticale , 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[70]  G. Roeder,et al.  Expression and DNA sequence of RED1, a gene required for meiosis I chromosome segregation in yeast , 1989, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[71]  J. Loidl Effects of elevated temperature on meiotic chromosome synapsis in Allium ursinum , 1989, Chromosoma.

[72]  N. M. Hollingsworth,et al.  HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. , 1989, Genetics.

[73]  S. Albini,et al.  Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum. II. Pachytene observations: the SC karyotype and the correspondence of late recombination nodules and chiasmata , 1988 .

[74]  H. Oakley,et al.  Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela) , 1982, Chromosoma.

[75]  D. Laurie,et al.  Inter-individual variation in chiasma distribution in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) , 1981, Heredity.

[76]  W. Peacock,et al.  Asynchronous replication of heterochromatin in maize. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  H. Fletcher Localised chiasmata due to partial pairing: A 3D reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes in male Stethophyma grossum , 1978, Chromosoma.

[78]  G. H. Jones,et al.  Incomplete chromosome pairing and its relation to chiasma localisation in Stethophyma grossum spermatocytes , 1978, Heredity.

[79]  C. Tease Cytological detection of crossing-over in BUdR substituted meiotic chromosomes using the fluorescent plus Giemsa technique , 1978, Nature.

[80]  G. Jones Giemsa C-banding of rye meiotic chromosomes and the nature of “terminal” chiasmata , 1978, Chromosoma.

[81]  A. T. Carpenter Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females: II. The recombination nodule--a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  D. P. Fox The control of chiasma distribution in the locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål) , 1973, Chromosoma.

[83]  M. D. Bennett,et al.  Duration of meiosis in barley , 1971 .

[84]  H. G. Callan,et al.  The Form of Bivalent Chromosomes in Newt Oocytes at First Metaphase of Meiosis , 1963 .

[85]  Mary Fogwill Differences in crossing-over and chromosome size in the sex cells of Lilium and Fritillaria , 1957, Chromosoma.

[86]  J. Innes,et al.  The influence of temperature on meiosis , 1957, Heredity.

[87]  B. Mcclintock Mutable Loci in Maize , 1951 .

[88]  C. D. Darlington,et al.  Fritillaria Meleagris: Chiasmaformation and distribution , 1930, Journal of Genetics.

[89]  A. Sturtevant,et al.  THE LINEAR ARRANGEMENT OF SIX SEX-LINKED FACTORS IN DROSOPHILA, AS SHOWN BY THEIR MODE OF ASSOCIATION , 1913 .

[90]  G. Ladizinsky Studies in Oat Evolution , 2012, SpringerBriefs in Agriculture.

[91]  I. Leitch,et al.  Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[92]  D. Sandhu,et al.  Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[93]  C. Tease,et al.  Analysis of exchanges in differentially stained meiotic chromosomes of Locusta migratoria after BrdU-substitution and FPG staining , 2004, Chromosoma.

[94]  C. Tease,et al.  Analysis of exchanges in differentially stained meiotic chromosomes of Locusta migratoria after BrdU-substitution and FPG staining , 2004, Chromosoma.

[95]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[96]  A. Meister,et al.  Cytologically integrated physical restriction fragment length polymorphism maps for the barley genome based on translocation breakpoints. , 2000, Genetics.

[97]  F. Franklin,et al.  A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1 , 2000, Chromosoma.

[98]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.

[99]  Jones Gh The control of chiasma distribution. , 1984 .

[100]  George W. Beadle,et al.  A summary of linkage studies in maize , 1935 .